Richard Dawkins Sinks Noah's Ark


raymond lindroth
raymond lindroth

The 10 lost tribes of Israel are NOT LOST. THE Creator Yahweh spread the 10 tribes of Israel around the world so He could put the literal blood of Abraham in the SAVED. Only Yahweh's born again Israel has ever been saved and ONLY Yahweh's born again Israel will ever be saved. ONLY those who have the literal blood of Abraham AND born of Yahweh will be saved. Born of the water and the Spirit. John 3: 5. NO Jew or christian has ever been saved . Both must be born again.John 3: 1- 8. John 1: 12- 13, 1 John 3: 9. WHEN a Jew or christian is born again they CEASE from being Jews and Christians and are GRAFTED into Yahweh's born again Anointed ONES. Rom. 11: 11- 33. May THE creator Yahweh give you your hearts desire. Heb. 12: 14. bless you

Vor 20 Tage
OhMyMy
OhMyMy

ok

Vor 21 Tag
Person
Person

Dawkins is going on the misconception that the ENTIRE WORLD was flooded and not a small portion. Not too mention that he hypocritically states that he doesn't want anybodys religion to be taught PERIOD he just wants his own religion to be taught in schools with Christian, Jewish, Muslim, etc. people's money.

Vor Monat
RM apCynan
RM apCynan

The Bible doesn't say anything like what you claim. Genesis 6:17.  KJV  And,  behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die. NIV  I am going to bring floodwaters on the earth to destroy all life under the heavens, every creature that has the breath of life in it. Everything on earth will perish. Sorry, your 'local flood' excuse doesn't hold water (pun intended) I do like the excuse that the only people alive on the entire planet at the time the flood was supposed to have occurred lived in North Africa and the Middle East. That's priceless. I read that Biblical data places the flood at 2304BCE +/- 11 years.  Stonehenge has been dated to 3000BCE, so there were humans in Britain before the flood, and there are sites throughout Europe and in South America that show human existence before the time of the claimed flood.

Vor 22 Tage
Boxspot
Boxspot

IP - Yer, amazing isn't it? An all powerful creator of the cosmos and life, but is too shy to talk to more than one illiterate person at a time. Well, that makes total sense. :)

Vor Monat
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

@Boxspot - "...why not tell us what convincing proof you have for the existence of your invisible Skygod, who apparently only ever revealed himself to some lonely goat herder or the like in some remote spot?" This still gets me. The same supreme being who fashioned the universe with infinite power, and knowledge thought, "Yeah, I am totally going to reveal myself to this small band of illiterate, savage goat herders about my will. Never mind they only speak in one language and they won't be able to write down my very important, super specific instructions to avoid eternal torment for many generations to come. Seems like a good idea!" Some people just don't know when to spot grade A bullshit.

Vor Monat
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

@Person - How is it relevant? If you are making the positive claim, so the burden of proof is on you to prove that it is. Of course, I would also point out that you don't use carbon dating for marine organisms. Snail shells are made up of high concentrations of carbon, so it is why carbon dating isn't used since the results will be skewed. It is called the "Marine Effect."

Vor Monat
Boxspot
Boxspot

Person - Yep, evolution is absolutely a proven fact, to the satisfaction of the scientific community and those of us who take our education and learning outside of supernatural Harry Potter type classes. "Nearly all (around 97%) of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity.[1][2]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution. I'll give you one simple example, fossils, if creationism were true it would be easy to prove. The fossilised bones of modern animals and humans would be found within every layer of the geological column. But we don't find that, instead we find dinosaurs at one level and humans / modern animals within others. Creationists can only deny this- often with accusations of scientific cover-ups - or ignore this simple truth. The trees through rocks or "polystrate fossils" (a creationist term ) has been explained since the 1800s .. they are formed by rare to infrequent brief episodes of rapid sedimentation separated by long periods of either slow deposition, nondeposition, or a combination of both. You can't carbon date recent or living things and get an accurate reading, radiometric dating doesn't work that way. You know, rather than trying to discredit established scientific facts and failing, why not tell us what convincing proof you have for the existence of your invisible Skygod, who apparently only ever revealed himself to some lonely goat herder or the like in some remote spot? I feel sorry for you P, you're a victim of religious indoctrination and creationist misinformation.

Vor Monat
Robert Jenkins
Robert Jenkins

I would like for Dawkins to give just 1 example of an observable and tested transitional animal, plant, chemical, or even a rock...

Vor Monat
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Robert Jenkins You are only demonstrating you ignorance. What does a transitional chemical or rock even mean? Can you give an observable example of a life form being created from nothing? According to your buybull there should of been people observing new animals and plants popping into existence as god created them. Yet nobody has ever seen this happen and there is no verifiable evidence that this did happen. With evolution there is tons of evidence that evolution is real and is happening all the time. Evolution has met all the requirement to be accepted as fact. Creationism is still just a fairy tale in a book of fiction call the BuyBull. There is also verifiable evidence that the world wide flood mentioned in your buybull never happened. For you to continue to refuse the accept what is true and believe in myths, fairy tales and nonsense as real make you a fool. Some transitional animals that prove evolution 1) Lung Fish - still has gills but can only get oxygen from breathing air. The gills no longer work. This animal is in transition from being water breathing animal to a air breathing animal with lungs. 2) Emus this bird is very similar to the Ostrich with 1 major difference. The Ostrich has feathered wings while the Emu has feathered arms. This is a living link from dinosaurs to birds. 3) Platypus - This animal is the only egg laying mammal its bone structure has traits that you find only in mammals but not in birds. it also has bone structures from in birds that you don't find in mammals. It also reproduces by laying eggs like birds do. The fur is what you would expect if feathers were to evolve into fur. The are a number of other traits that it shares with birds and mammals. Clearly the platypus shares a common ancestry to both mammals and birds. Evolution has also been observed in the lab. Creation has never been observed. Evolution has made a number of predictions on fossils Creation has never made any predictions on new species. Evolution is a fact and true Creation is a fairy tale and false Of all the theists I've encountered in my life I have to say that creationists are the most gullible, dumbest and/or dishonest of all of them.

Vor Monat
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

+Ignore Profile Forget it. It is useless. They will never educate themselves, read a book, look at the evidence. It's like trying to teach single-cell organisms to prepare a powerpoint presentation ;)

Vor Monat
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Robert Jenkins - You aren't paying attention. All life on Earth is a transitional species. Each time a species sexually reproduces, it is genetically distinct from it's parents. As those distinctions accumulate over time with each generation and faced with environmental pressures, a species can transition away from it's previous lineage.

Vor Monat
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Cesar avila - So where did god come from? Oh, that is right, from nothing. You too believe that something - more complex than a book - came absolutely from nothing and then proceeded to conjure everything else from nothing too. Worse yet, there is absolutely no evidence for the magic man who came from nothing and made everything else from nothing as well. Meanwhile, evolution successfully proves why life on Earth is diverse.

Vor Monat
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

+Cesar avila Christians only love other Christians! "and you are using the "watchmaker argument"...a very common fallacy. It is painful to listen to this

Vor Monat
Mattley R
Mattley R

Dawkins is one dumb imbecilic faggot. There’s a special place in hell for you atheist. I think you have evolved from an ape, just you. I refuse to believe that I evolved from a dang rock. I believe in God as the creator of the universe. None of what we see could have happened by chance over billions of years. The earth is only around 9000 years old. You have no proof of anything you say. Get some help you massive idiot.

Vor Monat
Kevin Smith
Kevin Smith

Oh Lordy, Mattley; You just got your ass handed to you.

Vor Monat
Boxspot
Boxspot

Hey Matt - Well, evolutionary theory does not suggest we came from a 'dang rock'. It suggests we came from simple single cell organisms; no one knows how those simple organisms came to be as ye but here's what might have happened... http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17987-how-life-evolved-10-steps-to-the-first-cells/ On the other hand, the bible book of myth, nonsense, cruelty and worse says that the first man, Adam, was made from soil (dust of the ground) and the first woman, Eve, was made from one of Adam's rib bones. So, to be a theist, you actually do have to believe you came from a dang rock, well, soil / dust. How dang idiotic is that?

Vor Monat
JLH 1295
JLH 1295

Rom 1:22  Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

Vor 2 Monate
RealityCheck
RealityCheck

Indeed theists do, even intelligent ones... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y201QzDdzbg&t=45s

Vor Monat
Cesar avila
Cesar avila

JLH 1295 agreed!

Vor Monat
Cesar avila
Cesar avila

Dear atheist I only have one question for you since you guys think you know it all , who was first ? Was it the monkey male or monkey female that was supposedly from a fish jajajjaja my bad the fish came from the rock and the rock came from an explosion ! And wait the explosion came from ??????? You atheist are all bunch of mindless idiots that have no reason , not one of you morons can prove to me that we came from a Big Bang , you morons it’s called the Theory get it theoryyy as in they’re not sure , what’s easier to believe that a rock created all ánimas or that from an ark all animals came afterwards

Vor 2 Monate
Pepe covarrubias
Pepe covarrubias

Oh boy Cesar! Que pedazo de idiotaa! You don't even know what are you talking about!

Vor 4 Tage
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

@Cesar avila - You get hysterical over someone suggesting life came from a rock, but blindly accept that man came from a skygod who blew on some dirt and woman came from his rib? Oh yeah, and your skygod poofed itself into existence and used magic to summon the universe from scratch. And yet, despite the backing of the scientific community, evolution is just too big of a bridge to cross? Come on, you believe that a talking snake outwitted your own dumb god! Christianity simply doesn't make any sense. It is god making a sacrifice upon himself to forgive himself because he doesn't have the power to forgive without a human sacrifice which is really just him but not quite. LOL!

Vor Monat
Cesar avila
Cesar avila

Oliver Dahl wow I can just tell how ignorant you are , first of all I can tell you’re an uneducated human or ape whatever you are , by the way you express you’re self you are definitely a sad excuse of an atheist at its best, when they know they are wrong they start cursing thinking that automatically gives them the right to be correct , lol u sad person ! and as far as the inquisition you moron those were the Catholic Church , there’s millions of morons like yourself that can’t think Catholics and Christians are the same, do your research dummy, Christians and the Catholic Church are not the same , so at that point I just destroyed you’re so called intelligence , as far as praying to the wrong God as you said ! What year is today ? 2018 ?? Hmmm I wonder why ?? Because 2018 years ago Jesus was born ! Do yourself a favor and actually do some research don’t just put out ignorance from your part , thank you buddy and God bless you !

Vor Monat
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

+Xavier Cruz yawn

Vor Monat
Xavier Cruz
Xavier Cruz

Yet, I am a son of God, and I reprimand your for speaking in that manner, because just to win an argument you forget about love. And if it's to curse and to hate, your talk is invalid for the purpose of God, which is to gain the soul, not to smash it and destroy it.

Vor Monat
Peter Dickinson
Peter Dickinson

Richard sadly deranged thinking only mocks himself . The grace of God saved me from deranged thinking and a fate worse than death! Unless you become like little children and embrace the simplicity of forgiveness and move on like they do as children thought a secure family life adds much to a person's sense of worth Jesus honoured His mom and Joseph was open to obeying God's leading.

Vor 2 Monate
Cesar avila
Cesar avila

Peter Dickinson amen!

Vor Monat
Vaidas Guzelis
Vaidas Guzelis

Dawkins forgot that there were no mountains before flood, nor deep oceans or seas. He is stupid to the core..

Vor 2 Monate
corey anderson
corey anderson

I revere sarcasm

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Pedophiles use grooming tactics of young children to make them subordinate. Sound familiar Christians?

Vor 2 Monate
plasticmoon222
plasticmoon222

u are a total idiot

Vor 2 Monate
Christopher Sari
Christopher Sari

What if you're wrong?

Vor 2 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

XC - I'll say it, you love being a slave to a primitive bronze age belief that leads you away from rational and moral thinking. A belief founded largely on the threat of eternal punishment, or a "cowardly" (your word) fear of death being the final end. You believe in something for which you said there can be no evidence - you believe in something without proof - now that really is being a fool. Thanks for the no more replies ;-)

Vor Monat
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

@Xavier Cruz - Attacking atheists isn't going to win you any converts soon. We live in exciting times will we witness organized religion making it's death spiral in the developed world. Organized religion has written too many checks that it cannot cash and we are now seeing the "fruits" of their labor.

Vor Monat
Xavier Cruz
Xavier Cruz

+Boxspot I'll say it: you love your pornography, you love your sin, are a coward before God, and you refuse to believe. It's not for anything else. Just a fool. No more replies to you.

Vor Monat
Xavier Cruz
Xavier Cruz

+Ignore Profile Just answer so you guys don't believe you are wise, but don't have time to waste on you, it's not wise. Believe what you want, it's ok. I strongly disagree with your foolishness and now let me do as your name tag says, heheh.

Vor Monat
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

@Xavier Cruz - If you already admit that there isn't any evidence for god, how would you even know if god exists outside of space and time unlike any other god? You wouldn't. You are just simply making it up while you go along.

Vor Monat
The Flat-U-Lator
The Flat-U-Lator

All forms of Religion should be banned. I hope no Christians work on the Sabbath, in which case the bible says they must be put to death. Or, do Christian husbands allow their wives to speak in church? They must too be put to death. What an enlightening book, filled with total and utter bullshit.

Vor 2 Monate
The Flat-U-Lator
The Flat-U-Lator

Cesar avila, I have not read the New Testament for many years. In fact, the last time I picked up a bible was 40 years ago.

Vor 2 Monate
Cesar avila
Cesar avila

Hey buddy have you read the New Testament ??

Vor 2 Monate
Christopher Sari
Christopher Sari

Couldn't agree more.. . including your religion.lmao.

Vor 2 Monate
rawdog42
rawdog42

Do you believe the Bible is real , or do you believe Dinosaurs existed ? You can only pick one.

Vor 2 Monate
Xavier Cruz
Xavier Cruz

+Krixonius Plays wow that's wisdom. Comes from God. No death before man, so dinosaurs couldn't have been dead before we existed. Thank you, keep strong.

Vor Monat
Mattley R
Mattley R

The Bible is real. And dinosaurs existed also. I picked two.

Vor Monat
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Krixonius Plays The freedom from religious persecution simply means: Freedom to be as naive as you want. Luckily man kind has laws against murder, otherwise these lunatics would still be tryin to kill every scientist for being a witch.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Krixonius Plays The Bible actually refers to bright red, 3-headed, firebreathing dragons, if you want to interpret the Bible to say they are explicitly talking about the Dino’s then I guess ur just lucky you have the freedom to be as ignorant as you want, I’m convinced that must be the real American dream

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

A. D. Erdei...when they are happy being a slave, they don’t give a rats ass about reality. Science has the key to their cell door but they would rather say “no thanks, but watch out, the warden has special abilities.

Vor 2 Monate
Robert Villegas
Robert Villegas

Coming from a guy that believes we came from nothing and a rock formed us 😂 complete idiot.

Vor 2 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

Christians believe God made us from nothing...and that clay formed us

Vor Monat
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Kevin Kannammalil ...I can only say that the education systems are failing, especially in this great US of A.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Kevin Kannammalil And the dinosaurs??? We have carbon dating, there are dozens of ways of doing that. Radiometric dating Radio active decay dating Uranium lead decay dating Potassium Argon dating Rubidium-Strontium Dating.. All these work in different ways and always lead to the same conclusion. Now what you’ve been taught by Kent Hovind is he simply says Carbon dating is flawed... so he misleads his audience be leaving out 99% of what’s known about this dating method, certain carbon atoms are useful only to an X-amount of years so a collection of tests are done. And I’m just pointing out carbon dating....he does this with every branch of science and a lot of people think he’s just a liar but I will give you all a little credit and say you all really believe what your saying, you just don’t have the interest in really investigating. I believe most of you really have the ability to see beauty in the reality of this tiny ecosystem in the corner of a possibly infinite universe

Vor 2 Monate
Kevin Kannammalil
Kevin Kannammalil

+Creation induced Lobotomy’sSee, you're getting it wrong here, God didn't kickstart life, He made life. When He made life, He made everything else with it, in the Bible you don't see God making the Earth, and then a few billion years break and then create man, God created everything in six days. So obviously, if man was created a few thousand, the Earth would be around that age too. So everything does not point to Earth being billions of years old. Also, you have to understand that we're creations of God, our three pound brain is not capable of thinking what the God capable of anything and everything can do. You see, if He created time, space and matter, so He cannot be limited by time, space and matter.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Kevin Kannammalil Can you give an example of another universe? We only learn from comparative means, if you had another universe to compare, then you could make an assessment about your own universe. Even if you were to prove a god kick started life then you still left with a young earth being ridiculous. Either way, everything points to billions of years. And still yet, if you say everything has a maker, then who made the maker of us.

Vor 2 Monate
gateway
gateway

Scoffers predicted 2000 years ago: 2nd Peter 3:3 "Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.” 5 But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. 6 By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. 7 By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

gateway there’s another book of absurdities called Mein Kampf, I’m sure glad you don’t quote that book as a way to live your life.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

gateway You ever think about why you can only quote 1 source when defending outlandish claims? I’ll tell you since you can’t read between the lines...It’s because it’s literally the only thing you can quote to back such absurdity. On the other hand I can quote thousands upon thousands of scientists and their reality based evidence.

Vor 2 Monate
Lugo428
Lugo428

A book with unbelievable claims predicts that prime won't believe those very same claims. Color me convinced.

Vor 2 Monate
Krixonius Plays
Krixonius Plays

Lmao, this guy is a better comedian. He is clueless.

Vor 2 Monate
Petyr Kowalski
Petyr Kowalski

...said a religitard

Vor 2 Monate
toptipple
toptipple

there is nothing more comedic than noah and his ark,maybe you have laughed your brain off instead of your ass

Vor 2 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

So, he's "clueless", you can't say how and you think Dawkins is the comedian ?! LoL

Vor 2 Monate
Krixonius Plays
Krixonius Plays

+Boxspot try everything....lmao r u the bff. Knw what i dont care.

Vor 2 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

Dawkins is clueless? That's interesting, what did he say that was factually incorrect?

Vor 2 Monate
eder catalan
eder catalan

Thanks to this kind of thinking, we have what we see today.

Vor 2 Monate
eder catalan
eder catalan

Brian Groot sorry bro. Those selfish priests will pay someday and all who approve of this behavior against little children. Take care.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

eder catalan . 300 priests did things with little boys butts and the pope gave them a pass and you have the ignorance to say NOT believing a story is what is wrong with the world. I hope you live in the county with the Arc Encounter, I hear it’s about bankrupt over Ken Hamms lies and bullshit....but not believing in that story is what’s wrong with this world.....I have a feeling you live in a very tiny world and you just feel better being ignorant.

Vor 2 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

dawkins cant refute history. The ark has been found people. Its in Saudi Arabia. The Red Sea crossing has also been found. You can fume and curse and shake your fists at God, but that changes NOTHING. Lets say I draw a circle on a piece pf paper. The circle represents all the knowledge of everything there is to know. You may think your a smart person, so what part of the circle would you take up with your knowledge in life? So what is left is the rest of what you dont know right? So maybe there is so much you dont now thats out there including the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Vor 2 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

Yeah, they found the ark...for the 9,000,000th time

Vor Monat
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Kim Westwood I just saw that you said “God invented science”.....ok....then why does EVERY single branch of science dispute almost every claim in the Bible. What a load of shit....think about it.....that’s why you don’t like science because it flies in the face of your beliefs.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Kim Westwood regardless if u have the video or not you must be someone very special to get that kind of god treatment, whats it been, at least 2000 years since he last blessed someone with his unholy presence.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

R M ....yea, she’s been studying for 25 years. 🤣

Vor 2 Monate
R M
R M

Kim Westwood. Omg, you’re right! With such logical and solid rock argument, you convinced me. Tomorrow I’ll be worshiping god ... Aleluia, I’ve seen the light !

Vor 2 Monate
Think4aMinute
Think4aMinute

Looking at some of the comments shows how religion leads people to turn off rational thinking. They actually believe in an invisible man in the sky who watches everything they do; that he used super magic to create everything from nothing; that impossible bible claims of things like a worldwide flood and a man living inside a big fish are factual and that non-evidenced mythical tales are history; that genocide and immoral acts are acceptable, just their God's way of doing things. Bronze age thinking alive and well in the 21st Century.

Vor 2 Monate
Think4aMinute
Think4aMinute

If you believe in made up stories in the bible about miracles enjoy.

Vor 2 Monate
Paolo Valencia
Paolo Valencia

+Think4aMinute that super natural thing can't be really explain,some people in the bible cant explain crist miracles and they dont believe it like you.. there are things that we cant explain because its beyond to our capacity... remember he's a "GOD" and I do believe in miracles...

Vor 2 Monate
Think4aMinute
Think4aMinute

Only faith can lead people to believe in an imaginary creator god. What you can't understand you give a supernatural explanation. Your way of thinking is no different to when people believed an erupting volcanoes was an angry god.

Vor 2 Monate
Paolo Valencia
Paolo Valencia

+Think4aMinute it takes more Faith to believe that we all came from nothing than to believe that we were created by god..

Vor 2 Monate
Think4aMinute
Think4aMinute

Yer, it kind of is without evidence for the imagined intelligent being.

Vor 2 Monate
Daniel muñoz
Daniel muñoz

I’m not so religious... but ... if the ark got dna of each species is completely possible ... now we have more and more information about the world flood 12000 years ago

Vor 2 Monate
Binome Sprite
Binome Sprite

Are you a moron?

Vor 2 Monate
A. D. Erdei
A. D. Erdei

Nothing consistent, just jokes. People believe this because this is the truth even if it is hard to believe for some. Adam and Eve, Matusalem, Noah, Jesus Christ this is the true history of mankind. But why God has blinded these people's minds to not see the truth, I could not answer this question. I would try to answer with a quote from the Bible: John 5:43 King James Version (KJV) I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. Do not believe that there was the flood 4000 years ago but believe in the extinction of dinosaurs 65 million years ago, do not believe that mankind was created 6000 years ago but to believe that the universe appeared 15 billion years ago, because of so-called scientific evidence, I'm not a fundamentalist just i have pity of these people.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Timothy Fuller....yea I don’t think god would even have time to deal with blinding or not blinding us, he be waaay to busy putting a stop to pediatric cancer. He’s super busy right now correcting the atrocities done in his name, You know he pissed about the 9/11, catholic pedophiles and the ridiculous border wars in the Middle East. So no he doesn’t have time for atheists, too much to fix. But I will say, if those disgusting things magically cease to exist I will give my deepest apology, and I know every single atheist would apologize, after all, who doesn’t want something that flippin amazing to happen.

Vor 2 Monate
Timothy Fuller
Timothy Fuller

God didn't blind them. They blinded themselves.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

A. D. Erdei If you want to tell the truth then I would start by telling people that you reject the widely accepted and OVERWHELMING evidence of something and feel real good about a book with scribblings from 2000 year old goat headers that believed that sacrificing your child will bring a good crop in the spring.... You literally trust that these kind of people really knew what was goin on in the natural world and a few of these flawed men spun some down right stupid stories. Just common sense things like your geographic location and parentage determine your religion, that alone is a HUGE red flag but I’m guessing you’re dismissing the idea as you read it because that’s indoctrination and our primate brains perceiving danger when there is none, and that is actually an evolutionary advantage. You’re welcome

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

A. D. Erdei If your purpose is truth then I’m wondering when you will see the irony in believing in talking snakes.

Vor 2 Monate
תומר רוזן
תומר רוזן

Holy shit youre stupid

Vor 2 Monate
Buddy Balagia
Buddy Balagia

O, ye of little knowledge

Vor 3 Monate
Alec Simms
Alec Simms

“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” ‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭2:14‬ ‭ Yes Richard is the natural man.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

YES AND i WAS READING THAT TODAY. NO WONDER ATHEISTS CANT UNDERSTAND.

Vor 2 Monate
Buddy Balagia
Buddy Balagia

After only a few seconds, I can comment that marsupials are found in North American, and marsupial fossils are found in South Amer. and the Middle East. Jus' sayin'...

Vor 3 Monate
Steph VV
Steph VV

+OE He actually did ask "Why are all the marsupials in Australia and nowhere else".

Vor 2 Monate
OE
OE

This comment is beyond stupid. He is not saying there are no marsupials in North America or elsewhere. There are no koalas in North America or in the middle east. Why aren't there fossils of koalas & kangaroos in the middle east if they were on a boat that landed there? And let's even pretend for one minute that they WERE on a giant boat built by a 600 year old man with his unskilled family. Why and HOW would they get to Australia? Komodo Dragons ONLY live in Indonesia. How did they get two Komodos? If the entire Earth was under water for that long, what did the herbivores eat once they got off the boat??? How do we still have insects when they all would have died? Or did Noah get 2 of every insect also? This story is stupid and anyone that defends it or believes it is foolish beyond belief. You're not a child anymore, it's time to stop believing in fairytales.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

The following link is a record of mathematicians, scientists, and inventors who are of the Christian faith. Atheists call christians stupid, but these people were far from that!!! http://www.tektonics.org/scim/sciencemony.htm

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Kim Westwood - For me to have missed a point, it would have required you to make one. I was just generous enough not to mention that your "point" is only a strawman. I agree it is easier to believe in a creator than the big bang (which wasn't an explosion) but that isn't because it makes more sense, but because it is very simplistic and doesn't require you to understand more nuanced and complex natural processes. If you can comprehend the latter, than you can easily see how the former is so much more foolish. You accuse something can't come from nothing, yet, where did your god come from??? It isn't likely any scientist has ever said anything along the lines, "...something can't come from nothing" because it quite literally happens all the time in physics. I would even raise you one and say that "nothing" is usually a "something" though. I also don't understand what morality has to do with our discussion because rape, murder, genocide, slavery, pedophilia and etc. isn't universally condemned in the bible as immoral. In fact, it was the brutalities and injustices committed by your god that made me reject him. Jesus never existed. If he was so famous, why did no one write about him until long after his death? Jesus is a mythical figure, just like Hercules.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Miracles happen all over the world. Science, doctors, reasoning can not explain. I put it all to the test 25 years ago , and its never failed. You miss my point about the group i mentioned but thats ok. Its much easier to believe in a Creator, a grand architect, than everything came from an explosion. Many famous scientists have concluded that nothing can come into existence from nothing. Then everything is permissible by that logic. There is no morality. Rape and murder is ok. Pedophilia is ok. Christians and Jews are hated everywhere in the world. Liberals are offended by Jesus Christ. There is a very good reason for that. Jesus said 2000 years ago we would be hated for His namesake. undeniable proof right there. When the Son and Man returns men will faint and cry out in shame and fear. Everyone knows who He is. Hes the most famous figure in history and written about the most. Every knee shall bow and tongue will profess He is Lord...

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Kim Westwood - A belief in god is neither intellectual or logical since the decision itself rests on pure faith alone. It requires an absurd amount of suspension of reason to accept that an all-powerful/knowing/good cosmic wizard who cannot be seen, heard, felt, or smelt who is everywhere yet nowhere specifically exists. It doesn't matter whether you are a famous scientists , mathematicians, etc because that doesn't exempt you from accepting foolish superstitions.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Ignore Profile My point in my comment with the list of people is that famous scientists , mathematicians, etc, believed in God and these people are highly respected and obviously atheists like to point out logical and intellectual minds dont believe in God. Atheists love to bark about intelligence vs foolish superstitions. These people obviously are highly intelligent Am I really a fool? My Father disagrees with you and I care more about His view of me than the opinions of men. According to God, the fool is - Proverbs 1:7 "Fear of the LORD is the foundation of true knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline". Proverbs 14:1 The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they have committed abominable deeds; There is no one who does good"

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Kim Westwood - A higher education doesn't exempt you from practicing foolish beliefs.

Vor 3 Monate
Mr. Hutch
Mr. Hutch

Hey! Quick question: Who came first "in history;" the lord jesus christ or serapis christus? Oh, I almost forgot....who were "the bishops of christ?"

Vor 3 Monate
God's holy child.
God's holy child.

That's a great question. Jesus Christ in the bible is not only worded as the Son of God but originally as the Son of Man. Jesus Christ is the first in history to ever come. As it says in John 1:1-5, you can read it in the bible. He is the first and the last, the beginning and the end. There is nothing made that was not made through and from Jesus. Remember Jesus loves you:)

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Dawkins is sooooo bitter he stinks

Vor 3 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

pelesky100 - You are not somehow "created" differently to the rest of us. The human race are apes. We evolved from a common ancestor of the modern chimpanzee and the bonobo. We share 95% of the same DNA structure as the chimpanzee. You can go on all you like about being created in your imaginary friend's image, but you can't change the fact that we are all apes. Sorry to bring reality into your life, but it's a fact.

Vor 3 Monate
Frik Badenhorst
Frik Badenhorst

"Pelesky": New rule: you can only make a disparaging remark on the internet if you've read one of the author's books. Oops for you...

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

pelesky100 Mocking who? If I was, how would you know that it is a good idea or not? There is no signature in DNA. DNA is just a handful of various atoms that are commonly found throughout the universe that are atomically attracted to one another. And if you don't believe something came from nothing, than why do you believe god came from nothing?

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Ignore Profile the SAME CREATOR’s signature is what DNA is. There is ZERO EVIDENCE that anything of the sort came from nothing Slapnuts. You cannot prove it. With all that exists you atheist jackflaps can’t produce a dust ball by “random chance”. You LOSE!

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Ignore Profile keep mocking Him. Yea, that’s a good idea. Let’s hear more , you filth

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

So comforting to know that Dawkins belief system replaces Gods word. NOT

Vor 3 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Brian Rossi ....so you wanna talk about seeds? those seeds are planted in children before their age of reason. That is strikingly similar to the way a pedophile “grooms” their victims from a young age. Guess where the pedophile learnt all his tricks? All the little boys butts are giving an overwhelming thanks to religion

Vor 2 Monate
Brian Rossi
Brian Rossi

+Kim Westwood It is clear in every civilization in every place on Earth that God placed in the DNA of all people something totally unique to humans which is to believe in and seek God and to wonder why he created us, our purpose here. Contrast that with the sinful nature that all people are born with that make us want to rebel against God and you have the reason why many people claim to be atheist and why all people need a Savior. The reality is that most atheist, if not all of them, do believe in God but they are bitterly rebellious against God for any number of reasons. Some bring that rebellion all the way to the grave with them and others ultimately turn back to God and find peace in Christ. Keep up the good fight, bringing the truth to the lost ones. We rarely get the satisfaction of instant change, but it's always a seed planted that is bringing someone closer and closer to the light and to the truth and to salvation.

Vor 3 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

Kim Westwood - Wrong again in so many ways. I do not deal in assumptions and opinions. Neither your assumptions and opinions, nor mine, effect the facts and the truth. I present the facts only. You prefer to keep yourself wilfully ignorant , in case you learn too many facts. Facts lead to questioning beliefs. Questioning beliefs leads to atheism. It wasn't till I freed myself from belief that I truly found joy and peace, as well as a massive feeling of relief.

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Kim Westwood - Ignorance is bliss for the religious.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Jusanotherfool who loves the sound of his own voice!!! Assumptions and opinions are the only thing you have. One thing besides not believing in God that most atheists have in common is they sound jealous of the joy, peace that Christians have. They sound jealous of the beautiful love and satisfaction we have in knowing that we have a permanent home and are friends with the Creator!!! Thats what I see when you say "you dont" "you have had no" statements , jealousy. There is nothing in this life you can own or have that will satisfy. You will be empty inside. Im done with you young un

Vor 3 Monate
crimony
crimony

Marsupials are found in North America. Just look at the roadside and you'll see dead possums everywhere. If evolution science were a poker hand, it would be a pair of deuces. The only thing it beats is nothing, which is literal creationism.

Vor 3 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Brian Oneil ....A lack of education is the only reason religion hangs on so strongly in 21st century. You hang your beliefs on the writings of sheep hearders who literally thought disease and death were just a curse from the creator, and you justify this thru years of indoctrination and completely ignoring obvious facts. Hence, lack of education!

Vor 2 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Brian Oneil - Evolution was invented by a Christian.

Vor 3 Monate
God's holy child.
God's holy child.

Evolution is just an excuse to get away from God.

Vor 3 Monate
Hector Pereira
Hector Pereira

The thing he says about all animals species moving from a epicenter seems a lot to me like a theory call evolution, and I know it supposed to be in millions of years, but still, is kind of the same idea he defends most of the time apparently; however, probably Noah's ark had more animals in it than the amount he is thinks, or the amount he wants to think, or the amount he hasn't really investigate for; I don't know . On the other side, migration, well, it then depends on every person, if you believe God have the power to get all those animals in a boat the same day and then for 40 days without killing each other, then you may also be able to believe the migration dilemma. One thing is this, God did all this because of the flood on the earth, that one time he promised was only going to happen, in this situation animal were directed by him for this specific event I suppose, I'm saying because I am not God neither. I believe he create the universe, so I also believe he could handle to make something like this happen.

Vor 3 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Hector Pereira So god wants faith yet he purposefully made everything on earth to point to the Bible being total BS and then he sits and laughs in heaven at those who use their brains to see the lies and the consultation prize for being true to who you are, is hell.

Vor 2 Monate
Creation induced Lobotomy’s
Creation induced Lobotomy’s

Hector Pereira we know you believe in a creator because that’s all you’ve been taught. You don’t care about reality when u pigeon hole your beliefs to include a talking snake, and the talking snake isn’t even the most ludicrous stuff in your book.

Vor 2 Monate
Hector Pereira
Hector Pereira

I don't like offending though, I give you that Ignore Profile, you are right. Guys, don't attack to defend God, he dosn't need us to de defend him, he is what he is if we either defend him or not, and am prity sure he dosen't appreciate offending others.

Vor 2 Monate
Hector Pereira
Hector Pereira

I dont really know if God would be able to do that, he may he may not. But Ill tell you this, everything you are not able to do, or anything anybody you have ever heard of are not able to do, God can do it,. and thats whats the bible is talking about when it said "God is all powefull". In the bible God is talking to men, and he is saying I'm all powerfull because anything you can't do, I can do it.

Vor 2 Monate
Edelbert Kharsyntiew
Edelbert Kharsyntiew

you got them Hector pereira that's why they thumps down on you... Dawkins is shooting his own foot here criticizing the epicenter for animal migration which like you pointed out is very much like the theory he advocates... not smart huh!

Vor 2 Monate
James Mac777
James Mac777

The story of the Great Flood is found in almost every culture of the world. Noah's Ark is the Jewish story of the Great Flood, and it is a tribal lesson of belonging to the family of God. The design of the Ark that is found in archeology is over 4000 years old and they were used to cross rivers. The Ark can hold all of the animals, it is as big as it needs to be, because what is saved is the family of God: A total of eight people were saved with Noah, and what was not saved is everybody outside who are declared evil. Everybody who is not with the family of God sleeps with the fishes, for they are nobody to God Almighty, and they are valued with the fishes. When you go fishing and kill a fish, what does it do to your conscious you could ask? Nothing is the reply, because it is a fish. The reality is this, when the calamity comes, and it is God's wrath, then the evil get washed away; therefore, don't worry about it. God's family is first and foremost, they get all of the help, guidance, and protection. In addition, because Man has the ability to save the animals we have every right to dominate them and use them for ourselves.

Vor 3 Monate
God's holy child.
God's holy child.

That's absolutely right.

Vor 3 Monate
Mr Curly
Mr Curly

James - I hope you get the help you so desperately need. You do need to get out of the death cult you belong to. They have skull fucked you. You don't even make sense. Tell the dupers to fuck off!! Tell them you are going atheist - then see how they treat you. On the plus side, if you convert to the truth of atheism, you will be so much happier. You will be able to experience life the way it was meant to be - before the depraved holy men stole your brain and turned it into rancid mush. Good luck.

Vor 3 Monate
James Mac777
James Mac777

Kristian 1957, Noah and his sons are kings, they rule nations, where God Almighty is non-inclusive, where you are sleeping with the fishes by the word of god to reject him, and it is your status in life.

Vor 3 Monate
James Mac777
James Mac777

Mr Curly what is your problem, ad hominem for people who disagree with you over moral codes, naming Christians cavemen neighbors who live with Fred Flintstone at Bedrock, because your BMW will cry for you at your funeral in the world of materialism after everybody on Facebook clicked you as their secret friend, but don't ask for friendship favors? We have always been talking about morality and ethics in the light of the family of God, and you seem to have missed the point of what it means to have the God-box (the Ark of the Covenant) defining the tribal god for membership requirements. One of your problems is you reject the great I AM, who is the Maker, therefore you are not a member of the tribe. When you don't belong to the tribe, then HE does nothing for you, HE does not entertain your prayers, HE does not value any sacrifice that you could make, HE cannot be pleased by your lack of faith, HE leaves you, HE does not allow you to enter HIS presence, and the angels of Heaven do not encamp around you and they leave you to your own devices: Meaning, membership benefits of the tribe do not belong to you, and in addition you are condemned in order to deprive you of membership benefits, where God sends you a powerful delusion to justify your condemnation. It is the Christians that God Almighty helps and correct and disciplines for the best future, not anybody else: Christians get the benefit of the Father in Heaven through the Son, and anybody who does not believe in the Son does not believe in the Father. This begs the question, what does the Cosmic God —— who created everything —— do with the Universe when you don't belong to HIM as one of HIS children, where Jesus Christ (the Son of God) makes us heirs and co-heirs, kings, priests, and of royal blood as the children of God? The answer is this, God cursed the Universe for the sake of Adam and Eve and their descendants in an act of mercy, and this means God does not help you, does not correct you, counts no sin against you at Judgment Day, and you are left to your own devices to rise and fall as an undisciplined, uncorrected pagan who is consigned to your idols to worship night and day, and you are given to figurative Sodom and Egypt as your supernatural city, and given a staff of rulers that is a reed that pierces the hand. This means, God does nothing with you, and you live in the cursed world, where even your money is cursed. The thing is this is the foundation of the world as defined in the story of Adam and Eve, because they choose knowledge of Good and Evil, then God separates them from the Garden of Paradise (known as Eden, it is God's garden) and you shall go work the thistles and thornes for your daily bread outside of the Kingdom of Heaven. God Almighty is non-inclusive, and you shall surrender to Jesus for HIS blessings. Heaven is a walled, gated city, and the archangel Michael casts out the Devil: Michael is the angel of Death, he is God's chief warrior, and he collects God's debt of those who are outside of God's Lamb (Jesus). You could even name Michael God's sheriff. The idea that God is a man with a long flowing beard, wears a robe and sandals, smiles benignly at you, and blesses you as someone who is out of touch and out of control is a totally corrupt doctrine. In addition, grace means something, it does not allow everything, where greasy grace allows anything. It is God's grace that we seek, because we are entitled to nothing and deserve the death penalty for our sins: Notice the Cross, the Christians wear the certain Roman death penalty as a sign of putting sin to death in the faith.

Vor 3 Monate
Kristian 1957
Kristian 1957

James Mac777 Could you be a bit more specific on your theory? One should expect that a person who is rejecting evolution which is supported by both fossils and DNA would demand even more proofs to support his own theory. It's not a scientific approach to claim that some miracle occured when your theory can't explain how Noah's family avoided interbreeding after the flood. The same problem is also relevant for all the animals which was saved by only two individuals pr species.

Vor 3 Monate
bettytigers
bettytigers

An old lady was told that a man was flying a biplane,(it was high in the sky.) She said"Don't be silly,how could a man get up in something that small! " She was most possibly a decent person,but ignorant of the facts. Richard Dawkins seems a decent sort,somebody who will acknowledge he's wrong when the evidence is produced.Let us all search for the truth,and not be like the fool who said of the Titanic "Even God couldn't sink this ship!"

Vor 4 Monate
JvVar2120
JvVar2120

Easier to believe in Noah's ark or that we came from a rock? Oh and which one do we pay tax dollars to teach our children?

Vor 4 Monate
chocobonita
chocobonita

this dude just doesnt understand evolution. on a chemical, biological level. he is in kyle kulinski's words too far gone. he thinks evolution is some cult created by darwin and so anybody who understands it is somehow a member of this cult. lol what a idiot.

Vor 3 Monate
Frik Badenhorst
Frik Badenhorst

We came from a rock??? Please quote the source where the scientist who subscribes to the theory of evolution made the claim...

Vor 3 Monate
Mr Curly
Mr Curly

Devout Darwinists!?!?! HAHAhahaHAHA - that's a new one. Maybe you could provide some names, sources, references??? Of course you can't because you just pulled that silly shit out of your ass. Really, there are fossils of humans going back millions of years before the imaginary flood that most civilizations never heard of, so maybe a retraction is in order.

Vor 3 Monate
Mdebacle
Mdebacle

It has been determined, by devout Darwinists, that all humans have mitochondrial DNA from one of three haplogroups, conveniently coded L,M,N, with the region of intersection being southwest Asia. The simplest explanation would be that all humans have mtDNA descended from one of the three daughters-in-law of Noah.

Vor 3 Monate
Mr Curly
Mr Curly

The one that is based on truth and not a disgusting book of rancid fairy tales.

Vor 3 Monate
White Wolf
White Wolf

Richard Dawkins wonders how those marsupials got to Down Under and the Penguins got further down under. Could it be that Ham loaded them on a smaller boat and dropped them off at places God might have have indicated? Perish the thought. Well, I have a question for Richie. He probably believes in horsey evolution, going from Hyracotherium to Eohyppus to Pilohippus to our modern horses. Can he explain how A) Pilohippus fossils are found under Hyracotherium fossils and B) all those ancient horse fossils are found in the Morrison formation of North America while all the modern horses were in Europe and Asia before the Spanish introduced them to the Injuns in the late 1400s? Noah had a boat to transport the marsupials, but who transported all those horse ancestors across the pond?

Vor 4 Monate
Kristian 1957
Kristian 1957

+Ignore Profile It is very likely that White Wolf hasn't heard about Occam's razor. And it is quite amusing to see "the flooders" create more or less esoteric explanations to try to explain all the inconsistencies in the worldwide flood theory. If their god is so omnipotent that it could create the whole universe, it could also have wiped out all living beings which did not meet the god's expectations, both without a flood and without the help from Noah. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Brian Oneil - You don't have enough water on this planet to cover every continent on the Earth. Water only makes up a tiny fraction of the Earth's mass. So that alone disproves the global flood myth. Umm rainbows are caused when water refractures light. Water can be used to separate the wavelengths at which a photon is traveling at. All you offer is excuses as to why the bible is wrong. I am sorry, but if you need to conjure a ghost to help you understand a book, then the book isn't very convincing in the first place. And, what is the purpose behind hiding the "truth" of the bible? To understand science, all you honestly need is a brain and literacy. No ghosts!

Vor 3 Monate
God's holy child.
God's holy child.

Well the evidence of before and after Noah's ark and the event of Noah's ark is so compelling only someone like this would not think this, because you have not yet had your eyes opened. There is evidence for before, during, and after. How do you think the rainbow came in the world. It's because the rainbow indicates the promise of God never making the world flooded like it was again. The next one to come is fireballs and thats in revelation. The disciples asked "what is the sign for the time coming back into the world from what was before" He said, it will be like Noah's time. Read the 3 books of enoch. Tells before and during the time of Noah and after proceding to times that have come to past and is to come. Also, God downloaded knowledge into Noah's mind just like nowadays you download something on a device. He taught him how to build the ark. Taught him about what animals to go where and to keep probably some separate, and give what animals and also dinosaurs what to eat. If you read in the bible it'll tell you, many people ask lots of questions which are good. But they don't bother reading the bible because they wont understand unless the have the holy spirit to help guide them. Early man after the time of Jesus's death and resurrection. They worked hard to keep the truth from coming out. It's not that it's all a delusion, but better than that, finding out that after our bodies here on earth have died and gone into the grave we go up to heaven for judgement and also for afterlife to the perminent life as this life is only temporary. Life in heaven is so joyful you grow so much more you just continue growing in so many ways. There is no evil at all there.

Vor 3 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

White Wolf - Or maybe the Great Flood, Noah and all that jazz never happened? Why does your god require someone to build a boat, than somehow successfully identify marsupials between placental and monotreme mammals without a zoology degree, and navigate each and everyone of these marsupials back to their specific continents and islands? No offense, but this is something only a child could believe in. If you are going to make stuff up, why not just propose Noah built them a magical rocket ship that delivered them back to their natural habitats? That is just as realistic as what you are proposing.

Vor 3 Monate
child_of_the_Living_God
child_of_the_Living_God

Kristian 1957 of you were to look at the amount of protein in any dinosaur bone, there will still be some there. Noah's flood came from heaven and is now underground. Jesus died on the cross to save all. When people didn't believe the bible in bc times they died faster from diseases. The earth was made in 6 days everything was very rapid. In the books of enoch it tells how swords and make up for women came for nowadays. They just advanced it since then. That part was evil though. I can always go on. The earth is around 7000 years old. Not billions like scientists that try to ignore the bible says. How can you say the bible doesn't bring actual facts when it's very simple. Unless you decide not to believe. I used to not believe then I began looking at many parts of evidence more and more and more, there's no doubt everything came true that's from the bible man walked with dinosaurs. In the book of job it's describes the dinosaurs in chapter 8. Besides enoch and elisha who actually never died. The first 5 books were written by moses, and the 10commandments were written in stone by God himself. Moses died eat drink or sleep for some over 80 days, naturally that's impossible, but because God allowed him in the heavenly realm time stood still. The people walking around for 40 years in the desert their clothes not only stayed in tact but also for children the clothes grew with them. You can only think something is impossible if you don't believe in the supernatural of God. It's not hard, just have faith pray something and believe and it'll happen, I do it every day. Saul who persecuted Christians after jesus's death, jesus chose him turned him into Paul. And he wrote nearly all the new testament through the holy spirit.

Vor 3 Monate
dysfunctional vet
dysfunctional vet

i was reading though the comments and i noticed a theme.....religion is not literally true.....then why teach or preach or raise your kids in it the bottom line, and there is no escaping this, until science can produce real life capable of reproducing itself something i can do in my kitchen on a lazy afternoon it is not science, it is science fiction or fantasy either put up or shut up, i do not have enough faith to believe in spontaneous generation as taught as abiogenesis.

Vor 4 Monate
dysfunctional vet
dysfunctional vet

sheheran, good call on this

Vor 4 Monate
sheheran
sheheran

Anglo-american thinking is typically dualist: you are either evolutionist or creationist; you are either socialist or conservative etc etc. In fact there are many systems which are integrative. For instance the spiritual science of Rudolf Steiner, which explains much more than materialistic science and religion combined.

Vor 4 Monate
Layback Studios
Layback Studios

Which is taught in schools and has 1000x more holes? One I made up. They say energy cannot be created or destroyed. Yet they say the Energy or the universe came from nothing. Yet they don't think the infinite power of God can come into play as the only explanation?

Vor 4 Monate
Irish Mule69
Irish Mule69

Layback Studios Ok go talk to your magical friend... 😂😂

Vor 3 Monate
Layback Studios
Layback Studios

+Irish Mule69 uuuh, ok? I'm Just tired explaining stuff to you and tried to communicate that you aren't very intelligent so you stop talking to people. BTW it's okay if I hurt your feelings. Cry on a rock XD

Vor 3 Monate
Irish Mule69
Irish Mule69

Layback Studios Aw someone is butthurt now....

Vor 3 Monate
Layback Studios
Layback Studios

Irish Mule69 I just realized. You Irish Mule. Is ####ing stupid. I mean. It. Is. Sad. Even after I rolled it out for you. Either that. Or you can't read. I used the exact words of the pro evolution and pro big bang explanation and wording of all the I mentioned. Other then that. I have no idea to get someone like you to understand this simple concept.

Vor 4 Monate
Irish Mule69
Irish Mule69

Layback Studios That still doesn’t claim “Something from nothing “ ....

Vor 4 Monate
Brian Rossi
Brian Rossi

Dawkins is a fascist, smug and arrogant fool. He claims in this video that 40% of Americans believe in Noah's ark and then says they should not have a right to believe or teach that anywhere, even in their own home. If that is fair, I would like to save some people money by banning your stupid book so nobody will waste their money on your fascist hate speech.

Vor 4 Monate
noahthelibertarianatheist
noahthelibertarianatheist

+Brian Rossi What is the definition of religion?

Vor 3 Monate
chocobonita
chocobonita

Brian Rossi haha me ?? A pagan?? All you religious fuckwits are the pagans. With your stupid ass rituals and prayers to a sky daddy. Walking in circles around a piece of meteorite. Cutting off the head of a lamb which is animal sacrifice. Talking in tongues at churches. Hollering and waving your hands in the air like an electrocuted schizophrenic. And I who do nothing of the sort, am a pagan?! Lol take a good long look in the mirror pal. And evolution isn't a religion. It's the explanation for the development of life forms. You understand it not believe it or take it on faith. Those tactics are only needed when there is no evidence for the bullshit you're trying to sell. Something which you have fallen for. It's not too late to learn. At least you can read English so you're a step ahead compared to most people on earth.

Vor 3 Monate
Brian Rossi
Brian Rossi

+John Price I disagree with you completely. There are many evolution believing/teaching scientist that are outspoken about no longer giving it any credibility. Science keeps proving intelligent design and disproving evolution and there is absolutely nothing that scientists have discovered that support evolution. Not one thing they claim can be reproduced in a laboratory or real test. What we can be reproduced and visibly seen test after test is what The Bible describes. Every kind of living thing reproduces after its own kind. Do the math backwards on population growth and you will arrive at the time period The Bible States the flood happened, millions of years ago. There are tons of documentaries that support creationism through scientific proof but evolution is a religion and it is the dominating religion in the science community today and most scientist who question it get fired. It cost way too much to throw out a millions of bogus science textbooks and print new ones with the latest scientific data that proves evolution is garbage. That is why we have the likes of Dawkins, bill nye the fake science guy, and other celebrity scientist Who lie to the public about evolution because that's their job. Unlike them, I don't get paid for my opinion, but I have studied this and it takes a lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in God the creator and what The Bible says. The evidence in vast supply backs the creation story and none of it backs evolution. World history has proven that people who want ultimate control over the lives of people, they 1st must in liminate God from that societee and that is what is happening more and more today, in Europe and even the US. There are lots of people in government that want people to view government as their God because that puts them in ultimate control over their lives. Promoting evolution helps them do that and that alone is why evolution is taught in our schools and not because it's scientific.

Vor 3 Monate
Brian Rossi
Brian Rossi

+noahthelibertarianatheist I guess my comment offended your religion, evolution.

Vor 3 Monate
Brian Rossi
Brian Rossi

+chocobonita no, your children won't get a job. They'll be slaves with no rights because pagans like you will have given them all away.

Vor 3 Monate
Joe Baublis
Joe Baublis

Ironically, atheists claim there's a lot of missing fossil evidence that might otherwise support the cambrian explosion. Another question to ask of Dawkins, is whether the absence of evidence is evidence of absence? Apparently - no. The mere absence of fossil evidence is not fatal to the Ark Theory. Furthermore, Dawkins inability to fathom an explanation for marsupial distribution is not fatal to Ark Theory. Why no fossils showing a marsupial migration to Australia? Perhaps because the marsupial population was too small, or there was no instantaneous burial of migrant marsupials in sediment after the flood.

Vor 4 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

Hi there JB, You’re welcome regarding Matthew 27.52. Now this will come as a complete shock to you I know, but I find that lack of consistency across the gospels, coupled with an absence of any independent corroboration by Jewish / Roman historians, as more proof this is a fanciful tale rather than history. More helpfully, it also illustrates how such tales are elaborated and embellished upon by differing authors. With alternative versions becoming more fanciful and fantastic. Not hard to see over time how such embellishments take the story of an ordinary man, perhaps some deluded Rabbi, to that of Yeshua. Psychopath is defined as “a person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behaviour.” To command whole peoples be wiped out, babies skewered on swords, parents to sacrifice their children, unruly children stoned to death, not to mention that people should be burnt to death would I believe qualify as abnormal violent social behaviour. I admit, the mental bit is up for debate, but I suggest such commands could only come from the criminally insane. Unless done for pleasure, which brings us back to a sadist. Maybe we could compromise on maniacal, egotistical, vindictive, pitiless Skygod? I think we’ve been through the pit of fire thing, unbelievers are condemned, along with liars etc, you agreed that previously (but you were unsure if it would be an eternal suffering). But thanks for the further thoughts. What is unbelieving? Well, I would go with not believing in the Skygod because there is zero evidence to suggest the existence of any supernatural creator. If you think your holy book has a different slant on ‘unbelief’ I’d be interested where you get that from. The babies going to hell is an interesting point. (This also covers ignorance of thy lord leading to hellfire). Theology has a long tradition of infants who die before being baptised going to Hell; because they inherit original sin which can only be removed by baptism. The argument goes that salvation is only through Jesus – check out John 14.6 and Romans 10.9 - so how could babies be saved without that knowledge of Jesus? Well, through baptism! The importance of that is highlighted in John 3:5 which reads "no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water". That suggests - according to some of your theist pals - all those who die without baptism are damned. Too bad for the unbaptised kids and my Amazon friends - more innocents condemned to burn by the morally perfect skygod. Or, would that make more sense as the immoral fictional design of men? Oh yes, it would make a lot more sense that way. Gotta say you theists crack me up with this stuff! Joe have to correct you on something, I have not been bombarded with “anti-God” messages all my life. I was raised a protestant christian. When I went to school as a little kid christian religion was actively promoted. I just out grew it. As I got older and a little wiser I reached a point when I knew I was being fed nonsense and I didn’t like the taste. With regard to ‘lies’ I’m not a compulsive liar Joe and I am honest enough to admit I’ve told a few in my life. Would you claim you have never told a single lie in your life? About anything? If you have, that makes you a liar and surely bound for thy pit of fire. At least you’d have the satisfaction of telling me you were right as we fry together. LoL. However powerful your skygod I would never want to worship it; anything that offers the choice of grovelling servitude and adoration or a tortuous burning death doesn’t deserve it. Actually, no one deserves to be worshipped, its a primitive concept. Let alone an entity that demands parents be willing to sacrifice their children to it. If said Skygod did exist and asked me to sacrifice my kid to it I’d tell it to ‘go forth and multiple’ (that means f**k off btw). I guess given the same choice you’d eagerly plunge the dagger into your kid with joyful thanks. And there we have the difference between the theist and non-believer. Your reply to… "Does it really never strike you as a little odd, a bit of a contradiction, that a benevolent loving supernatural all powerful being would punish some of his children with a fiery tortuous death or possibly an eternal torment, for not knowing about him, or, being born and raised into the wrong religion?" …. Is interesting. . You said ..” Innocent things get killed frequently in order to create better scenarios.”... I can agree with that to an extent. Do recall when I said how allied bombing must have killed babies and innocent civilians during WWII? But what you ignore is the ‘weeding’ your Skygod undertakes according to your holy book, intentionally causes unnecessary agonising tortuous pain and suffering. You previously tried to excuse that by implying your creator of the cosmos might not be able to end people’s existence without the gruesome torture. Well, that shows two things: (1) You can’t then believe thy Skygod is all powerful, as he lacks the power to end people existence humanely. Which is odd coming from a theist. (2) Religious belief lobotomises people’s humanity. On the latter point, I don’t really agree treating Jock Itch is on a par with skewering babies on a sword. But then, I am no theist. I would say a more toxic and pathological situation is one that leads normally moral, intelligent, even a nice guy like yourself to consider butchering people, including children and babies, as some divine crusade. You say it is immoral to kill someone for perjury. I actually asked if it would be acceptable to burn them to death for committing that crime. And if not why? Rather than dancing around this, I’ll take it you don’t agree with burning people to death for lying, that would be a hideous, cruel undertaking that only a truly evil warped individual would consider reasonable. But still, for you it’s ok if thy Skygod does it. I say again, Religious belief lobotomises people’s humanity. Err Joshua was carrying out the Skygods command, including the explicit command to put babies to the sword, according to thy holy book. So, the judgement should be something like... "Good Job on getting all those evil babies" ....surely? I don’t think you’re right in saying belief is enough for a passage to the imaginary afterlife – if that’s what you meant. All the commandments / rules also have to be adhered to and / or repentance made whilst living. Which is hard for hidden Amazon tribes who the skygod apparently forgot about. All powerful but couldn't get a simple message out to save them from the pit of fire. What a divine duffer! Thumb up on the banjo playing! Nice location and lady friend. Busy time coming up in the Boxspot household Joe so may be late getting back to you.

Vor 3 Monate
Joe Baublis
Joe Baublis

Hello Boxspot, Thank you for the reference to Matthew 27:52. I read it, and I was shocked. But there it is. I checked an alternative source for an opinion. Yes. Matthew claims that some people were resurrected when Yeshua died. Even more amazing is that such a claim, along with Yeshua's resurrection, is completely non-jewish. So, Matthew's narrative is considered by some to be more credible because it could not have originated from his tradition. You wrote, "I gave you the point before on ‘sadistic’, pointed out that burning people alive without the pleasure would be better described as the act of a psychopath. " Reply. Doubtful that psychopath is applicable. Psychopathy is a diagnosis, and would require a complete medical evaluation first. That seems to me to be implausible on a immaterial but sentient being. You wrote, "So, for someone like myself, or, a Hindu, or a Jain, it still looks to me like we’re heading for thy pit of fire. Or to put that another way, the child molesting, murdering rapist who truly repents on death row goes to the heaven. But me and the Jains and Hindu’s burn. " Reply. Perhaps. Perhaps not. The key factor is whether your name appears in the "book of life". Revelation 20: 15 "15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire." Will you and the Jains have your name in the book? I don't know. Apparently, if you get your name into the book of life - you are NOT cast in the lake of fire. Some people will be thrown into the lake of fire and have their "second death". Revelation 21: 8 "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." But what is "unbelieving"? Does that mean dis-belief of God? Or Yeshua? Or maybe something else? It doesn't say. And what does "have their part in the lake" mean? Does that mean they get some sort of pro-rated punishment? Is "their part" a pro-rata? Maybe you burn for 100 years and then get let out??? It's not real clear to me. So I'm inclined to view your claims with skepticism. What about somebody who - like you mentioned - never even heard of Yeshua or possibly never heard of God - like an aborted baby. Should that little aborted baby be throne in a lake of fire? Perhaps not! You know, you've mentioned "unbelievers" but you did NOT mention what happens to people who never heard of Jesus, and that's an entirely different scenario. Right? What about people - like you! Someone who has heard a little about Yeshua, and read a little bit in the bible, and you've heard a little about God. But you've also been bombarded with anti-God messages all your life. Should you burn in the lake of fire for that? IMO - no. But if you spend your life turning people away from Yeshua and away from GOD, by using your own lies and deception - then perhaps yes you should burn. What if you get to the Great White Throne, and you see me on the other side playing my banjo and singing "we shall gather at the river" - and all of a sudden you decide that you want to have life and worship God after all? Even though you were a liar and cheat and bastard all your life? Apparently, there is hope for you, Boxspot. Revelation 21: 6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. 7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. I view that message as a possibility that you might be saved, if you want it. If not - then you may burn in the lake of fire, but I'm not sure. Maybe they'll figure out some sort of brain-surgery or a re-education plan. You wrote, "Does it really never strike you as a little odd, a bit of a contradiction, that a benevolent loving supernatural all powerful being would punish some of his children with a fiery tortuous death or possibly an eternal torment, for not knowing about him, or, being born and raised into the wrong religion?" Reply. Sort of. But no. Innocent things get killed frequently in order to create better scenarios. For example, I have to kill the weeds in my grass in order to have a beautiful lawn. A customer lady of mine let her yard go for a long time, and now there's crap growing all over the place, and rotten decking, broken branches, weeds, saplings. Her yard is a mess. And in order to fix it, I would have to kill a lot of innocent plants. Or here's a better analogy for you. Maybe you can send this example to PEW. Let's say for example, that you had jock itch on your balls. And on that day you had a date with some tasty babe. So you take her to the pub, but there's no seats so you have to stand up at the bar. And every time she turns to look away at something - you reach down and scratch your itchy scrotum. Now luckily, the infection has not spread down to your bung-hole. Otherwise you'd be in real trouble. But you manage to salvage the date with the future Mrs. Boxspot (although she does have some concerns about you). And decide that you'll have to eradicate the jock itch. But that jock itch is caused by a fungus - a deuteromycete. And it's perfectly innocent. It's just doing what it's supposed to do. So, are you - Boxspot - a saddistic psychopath for applying an ointment to your balls? Are you perpetrating genocide? The point is, on your next date with Mrs. Boxspot, you want to be comfortable. And if you and she decided to get intimate - you wouldn't want your own jock itch fungi to spread to her. Would you? No! Of course not. I figure that sin, debauchery, and denial of the LORD, thy God is a toxic and pathological situation. And it's my understanding that the LORD is planning to wipe it out so that in the future life will be very pleasant. It's immoral to kill someone for perjury because perjury is not a life-threatening action. People only have the moral right to kill someone in self-defense. Only the LORD, thy God may kill other people. But the issue you raised in Exodus and Numbers with Joshua is a concern for me. It's a concern for me along the lines that you describe - that other religions like Islam appear to be using God as a reason to slaughter people. The question is, did GOD really instruct Joshua to kill the Canaanites? According to the bible - yes. And according to the bible - Joshua will be judged. You know, a lot of "christians" here in my nation seemed to be in favor of attacking Iraq and Afghanistan. And our former president - Obama - apparently actually armed and supported and directed ISIS to attack Libya. I have no idea how many millions of people were slaughtered as a result. (BTW, the reports are that the US Federal Reserve instructed US military to seize Libya's gold in that operation.) The theological question is - will the "christians" who participated in that action be judged for murder? I hope so! Do they get a pass into everlasting life merely because they "believe" in Yeshua? Apparently yes. Apparently, that mere "belief" is the key element that will save even the worst people. But you also argued that many people have never even heard of Yeshua or God. What about them? I reply that "belief" is not equivalent to "knowledge", and "disbelief" is not equivalent to "ignorance". Your case may be different because you may have "willful ignorance". That may end up being a ball-buster. Here's another banjo lick for ya! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmD9AXe2qs

Vor 3 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

Hey Joe And same to you my theistic friend & 10/10 for effort. Your reply to "Could you explain how a tribe in the Amazon that has never had any contact with other people, who know nothing about your particular skygod or his rules, were given that “choice”? OK, so you’ve explained Satan is cast into the pit of fire. Where he will be tormented for eternity (now you’re saying maybe people too on the suffering). No need to apologise, I’m fine with the non-believer tag. In truth, have to add liar as well, told a few in my life to date. So, I guess the big guy has me on at least two crimes. I gave you the point before on ‘sadistic’, pointed out that burning people alive without the pleasure would be better described as the act of a psychopath. Ahh. Repentance. That’s a good effort JB, but only works within the context of repentance (which may mean a change of mind according to some of your theist chums) being linked to belief whilst living. So, for someone like myself, or, a Hindu, or a Jain, it still looks to me like we’re heading for thy pit of fire. Or to put that another way, the child molesting, murdering rapist who truly repents on death row goes to the heaven. But me and the Jains and Hindu’s burn. What a downer. As you say, we are judged by our acts when we lived – so, as an unbeliever, or someone of a different faith (perhaps who Christianity never reached), we will be thrown into the pit of fire. Very fair and reasonable. Bit of a big assumption on your part regarding those of us cast into the lake of fire not suffering, but I note you now acknowledge it might be an eternal suffering. That moves you closer to many other theists who believe in a literal hell and your change in thinking – albeit a “maybe” – is interesting. You accept people may suffer in torment and anguish forever and are ok with that I guess. More morally perfect work of thy skygod. Or, more likely, the immoral creation of men in seeking control over others though fear. Incidentally there were far more resurrections according to Matthew 27.52 (very odd, such an event wasn’t recorded in the other “reliable” Gospels, or by Jewish or Roman historians. The rising of the dead must have been a fairly mundane thing). To be clear, so, the ‘hidden’ Amazons, as unbelievers must also be committed to the lake of fire. Sent to possibly an eternal fiery torment. All because thy skygod couldn’t be bothered to contact them and let them know the pathway to enlightenment and salvation. He was fine talking to some lonely goat herder on top of a mountain in ancient Persia (was it Persia?). But the Amazon rainforest? Nah, too wet and humid and all those trees get in the way. Sounds totally reasonable JB. I keep saying don’t apologise. I’m happy you’ve agreed where your faith takes you. But sorry to say it’s a very dark place. When you nail it down, your way of thinking really is no different to that which leads religious terrorists to carry out and justify their evil actions. Before you cry out in defence consider this, you agree it is morally acceptable for someone to be burnt alive, possibly in everlasting torment for simply not knowing about thy skygod. Or, for being born into the wrong religion. And this judgement by a morally perfect loving skygod? Really? You accept genocide as a holy undertaking and as part of that, condone the explicit biblical command for the sword skewering of innocent new born babies. Babies??!! How is that different to the religious terrorist’s justification for blowing heathens up and who is undertaking his or her skygod's command? It isn’t. If only the words of Steven Weinberg could touch yours and other theists sense of reason and rationality. Does it really never strike you as a little odd, a bit of a contradiction, that a benevolent loving supernatural all powerful being would punish some of his children with a fiery tortuous death or possibly an eternal torment, for not knowing about him, or, being born and raised into the wrong religion? Things outside of their control, an accident of birth It’s like someone coming up to your family, pouring petrol over them and setting them ablaze because they didn’t know what he wanted of them. This is madness. It make no sense, unless it is the work of men, seeking control over others through fear. And what an excellent job they did, still working 2000 plus years on. PEW survey recorded what people thought about hell in response to set questions, he point was many a majority did. Anyway, you acknowledge now that the pit of fire may indeed be a place of eternal suffering. No, I don’t think you did answer the questions specifically in the way presented. But apologies if I missed it. But please remind me, why was it that you consider burning someone to death for perjury to be wrong? Hope you enjoy the next dance or banjo outing Joe. Cheers

Vor 3 Monate
Joe Baublis
Joe Baublis

Boxspot you are still going at this. Good for you. You asked, "Could you explain how a tribe in the Amazon that has never had any contact with other people, who know nothing about your particular skygod or his rules, were given that “choice”? " Reply. I'll try to explain. And thank you very much for asking. This is a very interesting topic. By the way, in addition to "2 judgments" is just learned that there are also "2 resurrections". Apparently, there's a "resurrection of life" and a "resurrection of damnation". The 1st resurrection brings to life all the people who believe in Yeshua. Apparently, they will live with Yeshua on earth for 1000 years. During that 1000 years dead people who never believed in Yeshua remain dead and Satan remains sealed in a pit. Now the good part - for people like you. After 1000 years of glorious living with Yeshua on earth - then Satan is let out of his prison. Satan will continue his rebellion as it was when he was 1000 years earlier for a short season. And then GOD will cast Satan into the lake of fire (Rev 20:10) where Satan is tormented for eternity. "“the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever” That is where your "eternal punishment" is - it's for Satan. At this point the 2nd judgment occurs by the Great White Throne, for the non-believers - that would include you, Boxspot. Sorry! “As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked” (Ezekiel 33:11). “The Lord is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). So it's not "saddistic" because there is no pleasure. How are these non-believers judged? “...and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books according to their works” (Revelation 20:12). 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. But I see no indication that these people will be in torment forever as I do see with Satan. Maybe yes. Maybe no. So, apparently, you Boxspot will be re-animated after Satan is thrown into the eternal tornment, and you will be judged by your acts when you lived. People like me - and other believers - will may be standing around watching you get judged. Depending of what GOD determines about your life - you may be thrown into the fire with Satan. If you want to avoid that fate - then you must decide to believe in Yeshua. So what happens to the Amazons you mentioned? I made an error previously - sorry! This is a new topic for me. There is no "choice". Apparently, they are resurrected - along with you - and judged at the Great White Throne. You wrote, "there is nothing in scripture to support your claim of a choice under that judgement. " Reply. I agree. I made an error. I have apologized and I tried to correct my error. Please forgive me. And please do not base your possible choice to believe in Yeshua or God on my error. I am just a human and I made a mistake. If their life is judged to be worthy of the "book of life" then they may be saved. But if they are not judged worthy of the "book of life" then they are cast into the lake of fire. Maybe incinerated into dust, maybe they will live in agony with Satan - I don't know. This is the second death (Revelation 20:15; 21:8). If you die in your sins, the judgment is sure and certain. You will not escape! No, you cannot escape. Because all sin and sinners have been removed from, the future is projected to be quite pleasant for the people who are saved. Rev 21: 27 And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life. In other words, there will be nobody left who might defile the eternal life in heaven. You wrote, " He could simply end their existence without the pain and suffering quicker than creating the cosmos, could he not? " Reply. Perhaps. But I have no idea about the engineering involved in re-surrecting people and judging them. There may be a reason for incinerating them. I suggest that you begin to believe in Yeshua, and wait for the end of days and ask the LORD, yourself. You wrote, "PEW" "...you need research, another survey of at least comparable size to counter the findings. Otherwise your counter claim is totally baseless. And yes it does seem to me those that believe in a literal hell have as much of an argument as you do for your belief. Reply. Nope. The survey as you described it only shows what people reported - not what they actually think. And the survey as you describe it did NOT include "arguments". I read your other remarks. We disagree. But I think I understand where you are coming from. You wrote, "No I don’t think you did answer my moral questions in the specific format I requested. " Reply. I did reply to each question and I posted it in the thread. If you missed it, too bad. I oppose the death penalty. But I hope you have a pleasant day. Thanks a lot for motivating me to read Revelations 20 and 21. I also went to some other sources for help. Fascinating topic.

Vor 3 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

Hello JB Well, it’s been like pulling teeth but we finally got there. The point I was trying to get you to see and acknowledge is for the only ‘crime’ of unbelief the most kindly gentle people in the world should be burnt to death (according to your interpretation of thy holy book, but as pointed out for other theists it’s an eternal punishment). At least I got you to confirm that point. No matter how good a person was in life, for the ‘crime’ of unbelief people are condemned to burn. Your morally perfect skygod will also commit men, women and children to be burnt alive for the sin of not knowing about him, or, having been born and raised into the wrong religion. How very morally perfect and good of him; doesn’t sound like the type of cruelty manipulative men would create at all. Thank you for also confirming that point. You said “That’s their choice” about people being condemned to the pit of fire for unbelief. Could you explain how a tribe in the Amazon that has never had any contact with other people, who know nothing about your particular skygod or his rules, were given that “choice”? Appreciate you can choose to ‘understand’ your holy book as best fits whatever you want to believe, but honestly Joe, to say people are judged under the White Throne and given a choice to believe or not in thy skygod at that point, well, it sounds like you’re making this up as you're going along. Unless I missed the line…and the skygod offered a chance to the heathen unbelievers to cast their doubts aside … there is nothing in scripture to support your claim of a choice under that judgement. The way this is presented in Revelation is that there will be a judgement as to how the victims led their lives – the book of life will be opened and people judged - and if during their lifetime they were unbelievers, or liars, or ‘fearful’ etc it’s to the pit of fire. Clearly so. “And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.” Revelation 20.12 I take your point that thy skygod may not enjoy choosing to end innocent and not so people’s existence with an agonising skin melting death, so maybe sadist was the wrong word. And I apologies for that. Psychopath would perhaps be more fitting to describe a skygod that chooses without enjoyment to inflict unnecessary pain and suffering on people. After all, we are talking about thy all powerful skygod. He could simply end their existence without the pain and suffering quicker than creating the cosmos, could he not? “For the theist any atrocity is justifiable" – Sorry Joe that would be TRUE. You have proved that point by condoning genocide and the specific instruction for the sword skewering of babies in the name of thy lord. Not to mention burning people alive for not knowing about or not believing in thy skygod. Crikey, the crimes of Hitler were almost tame by comparison. The things you theists consider acceptable – swords stuck into suckling babies. Burning people to death for being born and raised into the wrong religion. Wow. If you’re going to claim the PEW survey is not an accurate indicator for a majority belief across theists in hell as a place of damnation, then you need research, another survey of at least comparable size to counter the findings. Otherwise your counter claim is totally baseless. And yes it does seem to me those that believe in a literal hell have as much of an argument as you do for your belief. Both of course are equally nonsense to me. What more can I say? If you want their arguments google it. I’d give you links but you said you don’t like those. I have not changed my position, I originally referred to hell as a place of damnation (I think you being a flat Earther, a bible literalist, I assumed you would also believe in a literal hell (note to self, never assume with a theist!). It was your denial that actually helpfully prompted me to find the PEW survey results. I then pointed out your error, that not only did many religious people believe in hell as a place of damnation, but apparently it was a majority view. As said before your denial of the research is baseless without reference to an equal or larger survey sample. You said all deaths are agonising. No, you’re wrong. When the time is considered appropriate, we provide animals with a peaceful death. Have you never put a pet out of its misery? If so, did you take it to a vet for an injection, or, as a theist were you more inclined to throw the still breathing family friend into a furnace? I remember when we sadly had to put our family cat down, we gathered around her as she peacefully entered into that final sleep without distress or pain. Dignitas (in Switzerland) provides a similar service for people who want to die with dignity and pain free. Funny imperfect humans can do for animals and people what the perfectly moral skygod apparently cannot; death without the anguish, and torment of a fiery pit. I’m not prejudiced about your holy book, I made what I consider a statement of fact. I invited you many times to explain how the bronze-age creators of the skygod tale were not primitive, ignorant or superstitious and you never had a meaningful reply. Do you consider they were as advanced as the Chinese for example? I also pointed out that if you consider them 'advanced' and that is a reason for your belief, why not believe in the gods of the 'advanced' Egyptians? (Or Romans? Or Greeks?) No I don’t think you did answer my moral questions in the specific format I requested. But in fairness I think you’ve done that now in a round about sort of way. So, I can take your answers to the specific points as:- (1) Let’s put this clearly into perspective. Do you consider that someone convicted in a court of law for perjury should be burnt to death for that crime? – (Don’t think you did answer this one but will take it that) YES I GUESS YOU ACTUALLY DO (2) Your holy book is the inspired word of thy skygod. - YES (3) The quoted passages (for genocide) are taken from thy holy book. YES (4) As such, your skygod gave explicit instruction for genocide, to put men, women and children to the sword. YES (5) As one of the faithful, you consider those instructions for genocide – down to the last suckling baby – as morally acceptable, [or to put it another way] your faith leads to acceptance. YES (6) If you do not consider those instructions for genocide - down to the last suckling baby – as morally acceptable, then you must consider them immoral. NO PERFECTLY MORAL Scary Joe. Very scary. All the best

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/cQoQgTqj3pU

Vor 4 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Not possible the Darwin way. http://youtu.be/ukC6V_9gekI

Vor 4 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Evolution is fact, creationism is fantasy.

Vor 4 Monate
Ted Bishop
Ted Bishop

Why does the Ark have a sharp bow when it has no propulsion system?

Vor 4 Monate
Joe Baublis
Joe Baublis

Layback I recommend you lay back and relax. I'm a proponent of creation theory.

Vor 4 Monate
Layback Studios
Layback Studios

Joe Baublis Except it doesn't..... there are many places where there are trees that's been layed over by different layers telling us it happened suddenly. And same for half a million fossils? By the time it would be covered by your atheist time scale it would of turned to dust. And explain to me why cells with a 10,000 year shelf life survive "10 billion years" in between dinosaur joints?

Vor 4 Monate
Layback Studios
Layback Studios

Ted Bishop You're absolutely retarded if you think we create Energy every day. And if 99% of atheists say there was nothing before the big bang. What makes you even think of there being two black holes?

Vor 4 Monate
Joe Baublis
Joe Baublis

Ted Bishop Ted Bishop Ted Bishop You seem to use your "stupid" argument a lot. Have you ever considered some other tactic? So, Mr. Stupid Ted, your anti-flood claim appears to be based on the premises that, 1. All other solar system planets are mountainous 2. Earth mountains have existed since earth formed. It seems to me that reliance on your premises is insufficient to draw the anti-flood theory claim as you seem to have done, because you've made zero connection between the other solar system planets and earth water volume, nor did you establish a connection between the origination date of earth mountains and the volume of earth water. I read your claim, I examined your alleged premises, and I see zero logical reasoning between your premises and your conclusion. You didn't even prove that your "mountains (always) existed" premise is even plausible, let alone actual. I've heard that earth formed by gravitational attraction of space gases. But I've never heard that the space gases formed your mountains. And your anti-flood theory claim remains fatally defective because it does not address that flood theory is retrodiction. As I understand it, judging the merits of past event theories requires sequential and simultaneous comparative analysis of multiple competing theories. But you aren't doing that. It seems to me that you are merely taking cheap pot-shots.

Vor 4 Monate
Ted Bishop
Ted Bishop

Total BS. The Earth has had mountains since it formed in this solar system. No planet in this universe it smooth. There is not enough water on this planet to cover it completely. You are stupid to believe that.

Vor 4 Monate
jchuck316
jchuck316

Richard Dawkins is a fool!! Non-Christan cultures around the globe hold to the theory of a worldwide flood. His argument about why are kangaroos in Australia makes about as much sense as saying if your grandparents live in a different state than you they cant be your grandparents. How dumb can you be and still breathe. Read a book people!!

Vor 5 Monate
Quidnunc
Quidnunc

jimmy hendrix Absolutely agree with you, my friend. The thing is those people who believe in the fairy tale of Noah's Ark are brain dead retards. Anyone who can believe that a kangaroo can walk from Australia to the Middle East or a sloth from South America, should be locked up in a lunatic asylum.

Vor 3 Monate
jimmy hendrix
jimmy hendrix

oblviously there are people as dum as you chuck , but reading a book is good , just dont read scripture fairytales

Vor 3 Monate
Quidnunc
Quidnunc

jchuck316 You are completely and utterly WRONG! Sand dunes with giant cross bedding occur in the Mesozoic rocks in Zion National Park, Utah and are further evidence that desert conditions occurred at the time of the supposed worldwide Biblical flood. Secondly, if all limestones were deposited by Noah's flood during a giant tsunami, then all limestone layers should show evidence of fossils being jumbled by rushing water. This is clearly not the case. I can only surmise from your comments that you must possess a very large head in order to contain all that ignorance and stupidity.

Vor 4 Monate
John Price
John Price

Layback Studios - I confess I've not read the whole Bible (I could tell you a good story about somone who has). I'm sure I've read that damnation is the fate of the unbeliever which did seem unfair. Maybe it is clarified elsewhere. Denial of afterlife would seem to be the best a non believer can hope for. Again, is that fair for just asking questions? Didn't Thomas have to see the stigmata before believing the resurrection? You'd think his sin of disbelief would be deeper as an Apostle. Second point, - stories, they can evolve in the telling if you'll pardon the pun. You might have heard the tale in WW1, a message being passed through the lines "send reinforcements we're going to advance" transmuted to "send three and fourpence, we're going to a dance". I don't think it's true but it illustrates that verbal record keeping is the least reliable of all.

Vor 4 Monate
Layback Studios
Layback Studios

John Price That's not what the bible says (last part). And if you thought for a moment you'd answer your own question. Tip: Do you remember any stories your parents or grandparents told you? Or stories Tribes pass down through stories from generation to generation?

Vor 4 Monate
Hitchslap
Hitchslap

All these religitards in the comments

Vor 5 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Million Shekels answer the question if you can. How do you explain it?

Vor Monat
Flavian Bumbac
Flavian Bumbac

+Kim Westwood you kid of checkmate him with that one!

Vor Monat
Hitchslap
Hitchslap

+Kim Westwood what does that have to do with anything

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Right is Right A deer, cow and horse eat the same thing, grass. But the deer produces pellets, cow flat patties, and a horse clumps. How do you suppose thats possible?

Vor 3 Monate
Hitchslap
Hitchslap

+Kim Westwood What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence

Vor 3 Monate
ParcKier's Hub
ParcKier's Hub

The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.

Vor 5 Monate
תומר רוזן
תומר רוזן

So Ken Ham disproves the bible apparently

Vor 2 Monate
John Price
John Price

Alan Stone - you've not asked for my advice and I apologise if this seems like just that. You can read Shakespeare to a Monkey. ....... I just enjoy the prattle.

Vor 4 Monate
Alan Stone
Alan Stone

Are you really saying that slavery is okay because the bible doesnt call it a sin? You're justifying owning a human as your property? It does not say that treating them badly is a sin. It says that you are allowed to beat them with a rod so long as they dont die immediately. If they die after 2 days then the slave owner cant be blamed for the death. Even if the reason for their death was due to the severe beating they received. Has religion warped your morals that badly?

Vor 5 Monate
ParcKier's Hub
ParcKier's Hub

Having slaves is not a sin treating them badly is a sin specially if you just hurt them out of your capriciousness.

Vor 5 Monate
Alan Stone
Alan Stone

What difference does it make how well slaves were treated or what nations laws were towards slavery? Slavery is immoral either way. God commands not to look upon a woman with lust or tell a false truth, yet he cant say not to own a person and treat them like your property? Is lying and having sexual urges worse than slavery?

Vor 5 Monate
A Zelenovic
A Zelenovic

He didn't even say anything factual lmao he just asked retarded questions that most have an answer for and or we just don't know how such happened, we weren't there.

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Robert P So name one point in human history where there wasn't violence in the Middle East and people weren't killing/raping children? Can't do it, can you?

Vor 5 Monate
Robert P
Robert P

Ignore Profile No thats not true at all buddy. I don't mind my life. I have a wife and children. I have nothing to complain about. The state of the world is getting ridiculous though and you are blind if you think we live in the best times ever. So much evil going on that you are oblivious to. Children are being raped and murdered. Being bombed indiscriminately in the middle East. And that is just by our government. You are a very ignorant and arrogant person.

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Robert P There is no better time to live than now in human history. Meanwhile, you can't wait for the world to die and for you to move on and hang out with your invisible sky daddy.

Vor 5 Monate
Robert P
Robert P

Ignore Profile No I don't. I've already said this. What is wrong with you? Your religion has you thinking we are the smartest generation ever. Couldn't be more opposite.

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Robert P I bet you also think you are one of the few "real Christians" and revelations is happening in only your life time. Again, you have a large ego.

Vor 5 Monate
johndaddyo444
johndaddyo444

Snicker all you like, and when you're done, perhaps you can explain why human footprints have been found inside dinosaur tracks? Maybe you could tackle the discovery of soft tissue found inside of dinosaur "fossils", which were believed to be 65 Million years old? Dawkins said nothing which represents a "scientific" criticism of the story of the great flood of Noah, and the Ark his family built to survive the calamity. Marsupials, in fact, are evidence that the world was divided in the time of Peleg, as the Bible states, not too long after the flood had wiped out land creatures (except for the ones saved in the Ark). Marsupials clearly exhibit the oddities one observes when there is an insufficient population of mammals to prevent interbreeding defects. The rate of corruption ends as the population diversifies sufficiently. Penguins are not "land animals", and therefore, did not require saving via Noah's Ark. Indeed, the fact that there are no penguins in the Arctic is more likely a function of the fact that there are no polar bears in the Antarctic. Bears branching out from the Ark would not have been able to survive the trek to Antarctica during the Ice Age which followed the great flood (assuming there was an ice bridge to reach the frozen continent). There was certainly an ice bridge enabling mammals to walk to the Americas. But they would not have been able to swim from South Africa to Antarctica. They would necessarily need to migrate from the Middle East through Siberia, across the ice bridge to North America, down through Central America, and all the way to the tip of South America. Hmm. In fact, we see only one species of bear in South America, and it is confined to the Andes. We could probably estimate that bear migration ended here at about the time of the end of the Ice Age which had enabled them to migrate to North America. Bears don't seem to do very well in tropical climates. The Atlas bear is now thought to be extinct, even though it had been transported to Africa from Spain by the Romans. So... unless Dawkins has some actual science to convey, I'll stick with the Bible's history. Dawkins wasn't there, so his science amounts to mere conjecture, anyway.

Vor 5 Monate
John Price
John Price

We may not see eye to eye on belief - morality, I don't know. Morality can be seen as looking after your fellows even if it does not profit you directly. I experienced a good feeling helping someone load their wheelchair on to the train. I don't give to charity on the street (like to be sure of all of the organisations ethics) so have an amount taken from my bank account _ why? As an atheist I see morality - helping others, as a genetic trait of our species, a behavior that is passed from generation to generation. What good is that? Good and evil do not exist in the animal kingdom, have you seen a Sparrowhawk devour its prey while it is still alive? You can see it as sickening - evil, why doesn't it put its prey out of its misery?. Sparrowhawks have no reason as we do, it doesn't enjoy the pain of its victim - it just needs to eat and its method works - so it proliferates fairly well, evolution in action. Consider the three most successful predators on land sea and air. On land its not the Lion for instance. A lion that becomes lame is abandoned. Natural selection will favour animals that do not become so easily lamed surely. African Hunting Dogs look after their lame brethren. A few dogs will stay with a lame dog during the hunt to ensure it does not get lost. The lame dog shares the meal it had no part in catching. Sounds heartwarming? - NO. It works in the context of survival of the fittest, that lame dog will recover and be a productive part of the pack. African dogs are more successful than any land predator and they act "morally". In the air, the Harris Hawk in the sea the Orca are the most effective predators - all collaborative social animals. Working together works? I'm sure that the rewarding feeling we have from moral acts is linked here but I can not find anything to corroborate it. I hope you'll allow me a little faith! Of course it can go badly wrong. Hitler was born Roman Catholic but used that faith to highlight that Jews were different and as being different that are an implacable foe that must be eradicated. Germans are not inherently evil. I watch the film "Downfall" frequently - best war film ever! Based on Hitlers Secretary, who is interviewed in the film. She describes a mass hysteria phenomenon. The holocaust was based on not questioning, blind faith - that's what worries me, if there is a god it knows that ( I always refer to god as "it", not disrespect, I just I don't think god would have a gender!), he should understand my views? Anti theism - Hemant Metha etc - Godless Cranium is another. I don't know if that is a good thing. We should all have the right to believe what we believe. I'm in Britain and I can't complain of the current situation here. I have heard that America is different! Only tonight i saw a video from the Atheist Experience that had me in tears. The caller from Florida, had a sister who she clearly loved as much as I love mine. The sister was a devout christian but the caller wasn't and did not discuss it . Both sister had been smitten with a life ending disease. The sister had heard that the caller was atheist and challenged her with it. Said that she was about to go to heaven but the caller was going to hell and she wanted to see the caller in heaven so she'd better make her peace with god or else! it had been a difficult discussion and the caller was clearly distraught, contemplating suicide. I understand that the sister will genuinely have wanted to spend the rest of eternity with the caller, and was under some strain herself, and she clearly feared for her sister soul, so her attitude - whilst I cannot condone it might be understandable. Godless Cranium did a video on the positive effects of a belief in extreme cases. There are numerous cases of people live being improved by "finding god". This is clearly a case where religion had fouled up a loving relationship. Again I say that's how I feel. I am quite capable of being wrong and don't plan to convert anyone, but debate is fascinating - thank you again. Where did I learn all this trash? I've got no sense of art - something my wife constantly reminds me of! My academic life was botany and Landscape management. So it must be the kitchen table. Time to sit and contemplate. And get through that damned Stephen Hawkins book!

Vor 4 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

John Price not going to see eye to eye on morality, ideologies or hypocrisy of certain people, exactly where evil comes fromy, whether it truly exists and what constitutes the substance of it, etc. I understand your disagreeing with Frank Turek but I do not disagree with his premise any more than I can agree with this Hemant Mehta, Dawkins, Hitchens, Ra, et al, all of whom are passionate about “saving the human race from God”, not just “disbelieving”. Seems real suspicious. Seems demonic to a Christian , know what we know from Scripture and what our Lord endured. Also, fascinating to see those who “have no belief” as a philosophy have such strong belief in changing minds to believe their way, hmmm. Any one can behave in a “good” way but 6 billion humans have six billion views on food, sexuality, decorating, war, peace, money, family, what is yours and what is mine and on what is good and what is bad. Frank is exactly correct as Ravi Zacharius and all Bible scholars agree with the truth he expressed, however imperfectly. You cannot have a moral law without a moral law giver. To say, “It is wrong to use God’s moral law and it’s right to use none” you are invoking a moral law. That is why those who know the God of Scripture have built most every hospital, every charity, every mission, every retreat, every relief effort and continually to try to reach those who freely deny His existence, and who nowadays aggressively mock and dissuade Christians from believing in Him, as Mehta and Dawkins do. Ravi put it this way regarding what and how we learn. Most people will never pick up a thick text book or the Bible so most of us learn ideologies between the two remaining methods. We absorb what is said around the dinner table or we learn from the arts. It’s obvious to the world that Hollywood affects Americans. This is also why Nietczshe’s works were so powerful and why Hitler presented them to Mussolini. Hitler wasn’t Christian, he was an atheistic evolutionist and his efforts to purify the globe were ramped up machinations of the “fittest”. Music is also ca powerful teacher also. I love certain bands but despise their ideology. For example, the Eagles are my favorite group, however Don Henley who is very, very gifted, literally mocks God in many of his songs, sometime 3 or 4 times in a single song. Now, if I were an atheist and not grounded solidly in Christ I’d develop even more contempt for God through this type of art, being validated in a very attractive, irresistible way. I am grateful I know better. Elton John; love most of his stuff but despise his ideology and what he has expressed in many of his less “popular” songs like “Jamaica Jerkoff”, “Alice” and “Painted Ladies”. People learn three ways, Academics, the kitchen table or the arts. How have you learned?

Vor 4 Monate
John Price
John Price

pelesky100 -missed a bit. Abiogenesis "once upon a time" - "decided" - no. Probably came close didn't quite work, all fell apart Maybe in another 1/2 million years it gets close again - no - falls apart again eventually may take hundreds or thousands of near misses before it is able to reproduce. That's what life is, reproduction. That's why the watch analogy fails, it does not reproduce it does need a creator. Once organic compounds can reproduce we could call them life. They cannot think, they have no consciousness to decide anything. They can only reproduce and in doing so proliferate. Mutations will occur but they seem are the stuff of evolution. No one says anything happens in six days. Not very exciting I know but it convinces me.

Vor 4 Monate
John Price
John Price

pelesky100 - I see your analogy over the partner relationship. Perhaps I'm asking too much in that "Silver Bullet " however it may be what I'm looking for as I got just that with atheism. After an upbringing that was basically "be a christian or be evil" (and I didn't want to be evil) I had two things - anti epiphanies is suppose. I saw Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" still the best description of the the universe I've seen, and I read about an atheist group doing disaster relief after an earthquake. How could atheists do something good and not in their own interest? That was my silver bullet and nothing has dissuaded me for the last 40 years. And I have thought deeply on it. Just as an aside. Frank Turek and I got off on the "wrong foot" really. The first few videos I saw he proclaimed that atheists choose that lifestyle so they can sin. Can you see the arrogance in that? He doesn't know all atheists, doesn't know what drives them. I took that as a personal insult. We are atheists because we do/can not believe in a God. The people he describes believe in God but choose to snub him to follow a 70 year life of sin. You can't sin on purpose if you're an atheist you don't believe in sin. You still have morality (Although Frank tells me this comes from God, I have free will in everything else but that apparently). The people he describes aren't atheists they're idiots! To know there's a god and hack him off? I wish them good luck with that!

Vor 4 Monate
John Price
John Price

pelesky100 - Nice imagery. The reason I would choose abiogenesis as the more likely theory is the laws of probabilities suggest that if enough organic compounds interact long enough it will happen. These things have been interacting for a mind bogglingly long time. It happened to take 14 billion years the way things have worked out. Slightly diffent conditions might have made it happen in 7 or 28 billion, but we are where we are. We cannot imagine what a million years would feel like never mind 14 billion of them. If however you believe that the universe is only 6000 years old abiogenesis makes no sense at all. There has to be a guiding hand. This is where compelling evidence of an old universe is key. We don't have all the pieces of the puzzle yet but what we have makes sense to me. Guessing that's what atheism is.

Vor 4 Monate
B RyeKen
B RyeKen

Yeah they came from rocks AHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You'll stay blind without The Lord Jesus Christ. You think youll laugh when your on your knees? All shall bend the knees.

Vor 5 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

you believe we come from clay

Vor Monat
John Price
John Price

B RyeKen I agree, I'll die, that'll be the end of it. You come from nothing you go back to nothing what have you lost? Nothing.

Vor 4 Monate
B RyeKen
B RyeKen

So Blind. You won't be forever.

Vor 4 Monate
John Price
John Price

Brooke - atheists do belive don't we?

Vor 4 Monate
Brooke -
Brooke -

@John Atheist beliefs?

Vor 4 Monate
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Maurice Perez clearly you can't defend you argument so you had to resort to personal attacks on me instead. That only reflects on what kind of person you are, and ignorant fool who has to lie to avoid admitting that you have a failed defense.

Vor 5 Monate
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Maurice Perez I guess after 1 day you failed again to defend you position. All you wanted to do is make personal attack on me and pretend I was bing childish when in fact you were the one acting like a butt hurt child. How immature is that? It truly is sad that for you to accuse me of acting immature when you are the child here.

Vor 5 Monate
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Maurice Perez You were the one who made personal attacks on me to avoid dealing with my question. Youi interpretted it being rude cause it highlight a fact that you didn't like. So so lie about. You were the one who was butt hurt and acted childish.The simple fact here is that Dawkins did prove how silly and ridiculous Noah's Arch story is and for anyone to believe it true is poorly educated and foolish. It is not my fault that their religion and parents reinforce nonsense but people have to learn how to think for themselves and question what they are told. Also, religion can't exist without faith and faith is being gullible. Acceptiong something without good evidence. Now if you want to have an adult conversation i am more than willing. So lets get back to my question. Can you proble god is real with verifiable evidence? I will also add since you've been trying tofende creationism and Noah's Arch. Can you prove it is real with verifiable evidence? So far creationist keep failing on this. It was so bad at how they failed to he point they had to invent a fake conspiracy that Science is conspiring against them and then they created fake creation scientist to create fake evidence. The truth here is that creationists are to damn lazy to do the work that scientists but they feel entitled to cut all the work to put their nonsense in the classroom .Perhaps they aren't lazy because they know they can't prove a damn thing the hones t way. So, prove your god and prove Noah and creationism with *vreifiable evidence* Can you do it ?

Vor 5 Monate
Maurice Perez
Maurice Perez

Chuck-U Farly You have absolutely no ground to say that. You are the person who began to make remarks in hopes to irritate and provoke a response. That is so elementary. You could have made a simple statement without being rude. You clearly have a lot of maturing to do. Its sad to see an adult behave like a child. Starting off a statement with an insult is clearly a sign of emotional unbalance. You need to take a serious look at your life and grow from this. .....Jesus is Lord

Vor 5 Monate
vaZz z
vaZz z

So u find it hard to believe that those animals came from the ark. U believe they came from a rock for heavens sake...

Vor 5 Monate
Timothy Mostad
Timothy Mostad

Jerry Tang. Most believers obviously can't understand how life began 4.1 billion years ago.

Vor 3 Monate
Jerry Tang
Jerry Tang

Dissolved minerals came FROM a rock. IDIOT!

Vor 3 Monate
Timothy Mostad
Timothy Mostad

vaZzz. Dissolved minerals, not a solid rock, you knucklehead.

Vor 5 Monate
mike pruett
mike pruett

ever hear of pangia continents were connected then spilt after

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Kim Westwood - Why don't you understand continental drift? Dawkins knows about it and you don't.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

very true. why doesnt Dawkins know that I wonder?

Vor 3 Monate
tromboneclassic 1
tromboneclassic 1

Ignore Profile, unfortunately, he or she seems to have never studied a science book... But most study the Bible but they don't use critical thinking because they have the mindset of miracles in the Bible. To them, the Bible is flawless as magic is to someone who buys into it.

Vor 4 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

lewiss1100 So I take it you never studied the bible then. It is inconsistent, incorporates different languages and the OT and NT has completely different themes. The 66 books you mentioned were just the few cherry picked by a handful of people. So the bible itself was put together by people. The OT is about instilling Jewish identity and the NT is birthed from a crisis cult responding to Roman occupation. The NT borrows heavily from Greek philosophy while the OT is influenced by the customs and mythologies of surrounding cultures. If the reader was unaware, they would come to the conclusion the OT and NT are about different gods. On top of that, the bible supports superstition that we know are not correct; there is no firmament, snakes do not talk, pregnancy is not the result of dirt being slung into a woman’s womb, etc. There is no historical evidence for Jesus, exodus, Noah’s ark, Abraham, or the creation myth itself. It is people essentially making claims without any evidence. It is no different than your, “I could dig up my dead dog in my yard & claim it died a million years ago, does that make it true” statement. Thousands of years ago, someone claimed that an invisible man who lived in the sky could talk to them. I see critical thinking isn’t something you utilize. On the other hand, land masses shift because the Earth is geologically active. Deep under the Earth, you have plate tectonics moving land masses around and it explains why the Earth isn’t covered in craters like Mercury. It is why we have the fossil remains of seashells in the Himalayas because the Indian subcontinent and Asia converted ancient seabed into a huge mountain range. We also know that at specific points in time, many land masses formed into much larger ones because they contain the fossil remains of the same species. Only a retard would deny this. Only an idiot would think science is just someone making a claim without any evidence. This is what religion does; it makes big claims without ever providing a shred of evidence.

Vor 4 Monate
lewiss1100
lewiss1100

The 66 books that make up the bible consist of around 40 writers over 1500 YEARS & yet all 66 books flow like it was written by one person. That's because God is the author.  Not only that God came down in the flesh as Jesus & studied & read from the Old Testament & didn't say that a single word was incorrect.  Later Jesus lead chosen men to write the New Testament.  That's how I know the bible is indeed the very word of God, that & the fact that every single prophecy has either already come to pass, is happening now, or shortly will happen in the future.  Continents moving for millions of years "through observation".  So your telling me men have been watching continents move with their own eyes for millions of years LOL, not hardly.  Anyone can slap any date on anything they want doesn't mean its true.  I could dig up my dead dog in my yard & claim it died a million years ago, does that make it true, NO of course not.

Vor 4 Monate
Prince hectoroftroy
Prince hectoroftroy

Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that some spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man.

Vor 5 Monate
Jerry Tang
Jerry Tang

@Alan: Your rebuttal proves you have another claim. You are so lazy to research for points in your arguments. All you want to do is type, "I need not move a muscle". Then obviously, you are not willing to look for truth but simply work off the sweat of others. COngratulations. 90% of atheists are people simply too lazy to learn about God and think they get by that way. Do you know that? Or are you too lazy to try to know?

Vor 3 Monate
jchuck316
jchuck316

Well said!!

Vor 4 Monate
EzpZ Diraimz
EzpZ Diraimz

Alan Stone compliment😂😂

Vor 4 Monate
Alan Stone
Alan Stone

I'm not sure if thats supposed to be an insult or a compliment. Thanks either way though.

Vor 5 Monate
EzpZ Diraimz
EzpZ Diraimz

Alan Stone holy shit you are an actual gem😂

Vor 5 Monate
Spiritdove
Spiritdove

I find majority I talk to that belive this nonsense is due to the fact they dont want to think it through logically. they think a preacher is like a teacher you dont question his knowledge so it must be true.. only one which wants truth will question and find evidence when told something..

Vor 5 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

True believers question and test everything by the word of God. Not all preachers teach truth.

Vor 3 Monate
Rasmus Andersson
Rasmus Andersson

Why are they laughing?

Vor 5 Monate
Rasmus Andersson
Rasmus Andersson

I was asking "Why are they laughing?". Audience seem to be laughing at Richard Dawkins. As if he's a crazy person. Unless I am mistaken. Perhaps I translated the laughter wrong.

Vor 4 Monate
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Rasmus Andersson do you really have to ask? Do you believe in creationism and the earth is only 6 thousand years old?

Vor 5 Monate
Rasmus Andersson
Rasmus Andersson

How is that funny?

Vor 5 Monate
Spiritdove
Spiritdove

because of the nonsense Christians believe in the noah's ark myth.. its laughable

Vor 5 Monate
William Ridgeway
William Ridgeway

Believing in any biblical story is equally ludicrous.

Vor 5 Monate
jchuck316
jchuck316

Keep in mind that the Bible was the first book IN HISTORY that said the earth was round. It was the first book to speak against 'blood letting' because 'the life is in the blood'. It was the first book that said years from now you could get a mark (or chip) put in your hand that could keep you from buying or selling (in a day when that technology wouldn't even make sense to them). You may wanna start reading what you are criticizing. Just saying. Think about it. If I was wrong, my penalty is what? If you're wrong? Please seriously read with an open mind.

Vor 4 Monate
Dr. Morteza Delroba
Dr.   Morteza Delroba

Also, Flood was local , near Black Sea, in Turkey...Geological facts...

Vor 5 Monate
Jerry Tang
Jerry Tang

@Morteza: Are we talking of the same flood? There had been countless floods, you know.

Vor 3 Monate
Soundgarden97
Soundgarden97

If the flood was localised then God wouldn't have completely eradicated sin in the first place. Also, irrespective of debunking the absurd claims within the actual story with the boat building and the involvement of labour, the overabundance of animal species and how they lived for months in particular conditions/food/water, and where it all makes sense now in where they reside in present day; The Mesopotamians or the Chinese had no records of any major flood since they evidently had a civilisation before any biblical records from the Old Testament. Futhermore, if you were thinking, "Well a global flood would render these civilisations incapable of recording anything if they were dead". Then you would have to explain the implications of this purported event occuring on a global scale. -If its global, it implies that God gathers animal species to Noah from everywhere on Earth so Dawkins would be right. -Where are the dinosaurs and the other extinct species? -Where did all the water go? -How did all extant species end up where they currently reside? Why not split up? Could it maybe because they came from that continent in the first place or migrated in some way and evolved for millions of years with natural selection involved that ultimately results in a unique species. A huge number of years that it becomes a notion that's mutually exclusive to the foundation of the abrahamic religons because if you want to stay true to the story, you have to believe in a 6000-12000 year old Earth/Universe.

Vor 5 Monate
getasimbe
getasimbe

You haven't thought about it very much, it seems. If the flood was local, then it was pointless because it did not accomplish God's purpose for doing it in the first place.

Vor 5 Monate
Dr. Morteza Delroba
Dr.   Morteza Delroba

According to my sources , God gave humans free will but the main reason to send the flood was not that they used free will but something else,,, if using free will means killing and robbing , then that's not good...also, as I said there was another reason... If the flood was a natural event then perhaps God knew about it and wanted to save some ppl, like the story of Gilgamesh.

Vor 5 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

according to your book God is omniscient...he knows the past, present and future. If he knows the future...either free will doesn't exist or he isn't omniscient. Which one is it?

Vor Monat
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Kim Westwood You said, "Not all the Matt Dillahuntys in the world can refute or nullify the existence of God." This is true since you can't prove nothing. It is not up to Matt or anyone to disprove your god. It is up to you to prove your god is real and your comment shows that you can't prove your god is real so again you dishonestly try to shift t he burden of proof away cause you can't prove a damn thing about your god. The path to truth is with facts not fiction and fantasies nor with imaginary gods for all unproven beliefs are diversions and can never be a reliable path to truth. Dan Bake could make mince meat of your conman Zacharias. That Faith == Gullibility You still have failed to prove your god it real. I have provided you with verifiable evidence that the jesus in the bible was not a moral person and that the god of your bible is immoral. The only resonse you've given is that you will pray for me yet the Templeton Foundation proved that prayer does not work so there is another lie in the bible.

Vor 3 Monate
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Kim Westwood YOU FAILED TO DEFEND SLAVERY IN YOUR BUYBULL!!! You are proving to me a very dishonest person. Whenever confronted with a hard fact that you can't defend you ignore it and pretend it does not exist. Proof your buybull is immoral. You are talking out your ass. Ravi Zacharias doesn't know the bible as much as Mat Dillahunty and your apologist doesn't debate on facts cause Apologist spin what they say. Zacharias probably wouldn't debat Matt cause he knows he'd get his ass kicked. Of the people you talk about doing missionary work don't know their bible. They are being used by their religion. Also, history has shown that atheist have been killed cause they didn't buy into the bullshit that you are trying to peddle so don't pretend that Christians are so righteous and are willing to risk their lives by goin to China. Why aren't you there? Why aren't you in N. Korea spreading the word? Statistics show that most secular countries tend to have the happiest people while the more religious countries tend to be less happy and have more crime. Dan Baker who was a preacher and did missionary work until he realize that it was a BULLSHIT. http://youtu.be/eJxWGyHUhLU Since you clearly avoided the slavery issue completely in a dishonest way you passively admitted that your bible is immoral. As Matt Dillahunty said, anyone could write a more moral bible jut by eliminating slavery. You bible is a vile and immoral book.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Matt Dillahunty couldnt last 5 minutes with Ravi Zacharias. There are many people who gave up their dreams, and normal lives to do missionary work. Plenty of unsung heroes who have died sharing the gospel without profit. There is much going on you know nothing about. Not everyone who professes to be a christian, is part of the elect and not all christians are in it for the money. By far and large the majority of believers in the world come from and live modestly. There are christians in China who can be killed for their beliefs... All your defensive comments fall upon a man who has been touched and changed by the living God. Not all the Matt Dillahuntys in the world can refute or nullify the existence of God. Every man makes his own choices in life and have gone their own way. Narrow is the gate and path that leads to life. Few find it ... I pray the Lord open your blind eyes before its too late. Watch for the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem and 7 yr peace treaty. That is all going down ......

Vor 3 Monate
Chuck-U Farly
Chuck-U Farly

Kim Westwood Here is a link on some of the things Matt Dillahunty has said about the bible and your god. He was studying to be a Baptist Minister when he realized that the bible made no sense and was an immoral book. He also comments on how religious people will deny what the bible actually says which is what Apologists do all the time. I would like to point out that Matt does not do these things for money unlike all your Apologists who make money off of debating and selling books. There is a profit motive for your apologists to lie whereas Matt does it because he wants people to know the truth. http://youtu.be/qeyGn_jCP14

Vor 3 Monate
Travis Lee
Travis Lee

Mesopotamian mythologies are based upon the overflowing of the Black Sea 7500 years ago has recorded in the geological record. There is a rational scientific explanation for everything!

Vor 5 Monate
Mdebacle
Mdebacle

Furthermore, all humans have mitochondrial DNA from one of three haplogroups, conveniently coded L,M,N, with the region of intersection being southwest Asia. This is because all humans have mtDNA from one of the three daughters-in-law of Noah.

Vor 4 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Do you know what’s my favorite part of the Bible? It’s when God gives people a free will and then kills everybody in a flood because of not acting the way he wants.

Vor 5 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

..and then one "white" ;) family re-populated the whole planet...gave birth to Asians, Caucasians, Blacks, Latinos, Arabs...and despite all that inbreeding...very few retards (Jim Jefferies)

Vor Monat
pelesky100
pelesky100

Keep reading it you smug ass, you may learn a bit more too

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Ignore Profile what many people fail to realize is that if you read Genesis it tells of the sons of God that left their celestial bodies to mate with mortal women. This union produced giants, and many freaks of nature. The earth was covered with violence and ungodly mixtures of the product of angels and women, ALL humans had been contaminated EXCEPT Noah and his sons and family. Thats the reason for the flood, to preserve the bloodline from which the Messiah would later come.

Vor 3 Monate
Jerry Tang
Jerry Tang

@Ignore: Without free will, you are a robot. Or you remain a rock. You think that's a better option?

Vor 3 Monate
Mdebacle
Mdebacle

Evidence in Neanderthal and Denisovan research shows that those things were 15-16ths human and 1-16th chimpanzee. We should conclude that the ape-men (aka hominids) were not human ancestors. They were the result of human-ape hybridization in Genesis 6:12.

Vor 4 Monate
Wanlam Jkeregle
Wanlam Jkeregle

Dude have u seen 2012 just see it and tell me how they keep the animal

Vor 5 Monate
Prince hectoroftroy
Prince hectoroftroy

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Romans 1:22

Vor 5 Monate
Jude Holemon
Jude Holemon

mike jones But that’s not a fucking unicorn. It’s just named after a unicorn. What the fuck are you even talking about?

Vor 5 Monate
Jude Holemon
Jude Holemon

mike jones Because Christianity is intentionally vague and confusing, and when a rational person asks for clarification or proof, you just read one verse and assume that that makes a solid argument when in reality it is nothing more than meaningless.

Vor 5 Monate
Soundgarden97
Soundgarden97

"Anyone who says this book isn't true, is lying" - IMADETHISSHITUP 1:22 Prince hectoroftroy - great argument /s

Vor 5 Monate
Percy Johnson IV
Percy Johnson IV

Prince hectoroftroy YES!! We've had lots of years of course also. Even as I was writing to you a bit. Partially because of the deep longing we have. But more so because of the amazing Grace and love our our Savior and Lord! Thank you for your kind and comfort words. The truth is more amazing than I can even express! I have SO many stories of good fruit that has glorified our Father regarding my baby. And we know we just have to wait a little while to reunite with her. As David said, our lives are just a vapor. But until then, I will spread the truth and gospel to everyone in my path, and worship the uncreated God in His majesty.

Vor 5 Monate
Reuben Dinny
Reuben Dinny

Percy Johnson IV there is something you don't know about the second law of thermodynamis, it is that it is applicable for only closed systems and earth is not a closed systems. The sun constantly showering us with energy more energy than we can ever use.

Vor 5 Monate
Prince hectoroftroy
Prince hectoroftroy

In the beginning there was nothing and nothing created everything by Nothing , and that Nothing came from nowhere and nowhere came from one of the billions of parallel universes which came from nothing.……. and Stupidity is infinite

Vor 5 Monate
Alan Stone
Alan Stone

Even if science was completely wrong about the big bang, it doesnt prove that god is the one that created the universe. It just means we dont have enough information right now. If science is wrong it will update its answer to better reflect what we know. When religion is wrong it makes excuses and refuses to admit its wrong.

Vor 5 Monate
Hitchslap
Hitchslap

Prince hectoroftroy oh the hypocracy so god came from nothing

Vor 5 Monate
Timothy Mostad
Timothy Mostad

Ignore Profile Some will never admit who they really are, 'Damn Dirty Ape' some are so stupid that they will never understand why the gods were created, some are way to insane to cope with the reality of the indifferent cosmos, and the long, extremely long evolutionary history on our naturally formed , 4.7 billion year old Planet.

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Percy Johnson IV - And how do you know that if you admit that you can't grasp it either? You obviously didn't think your statement through.

Vor 5 Monate
Percy Johnson IV
Percy Johnson IV

Ignore Profile God was never assembled. He is uncreated. A concept mankind will never fully grasp. Not in this life at least.

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/bAJH2hLw2kc

Vor 5 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r-e2NDSTuE&t=3s

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/W3kDdVQvrBA

Vor 5 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjFgcOId-ZY&t=485s

Vor 5 Monate
CYBER TROLL
CYBER TROLL

Well then mr Dawkins you pretentious asshole. Please explain to me why a giant boat was found in the mountains of ararat?..did it just form over millions of years out of thin air?..lol you evolutionists are some of the most gullible people on earth.

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

CYBER TROLL - If you, "cant get something from nothing" where did your god come from then?

Vor 5 Monate
CYBER TROLL
CYBER TROLL

Spiritdove good point. You just converted me to atheism. Thanx.

Vor 5 Monate
Spiritdove
Spiritdove

hmm.. so humans couldnt have put it there. or a tornado or other ways to put a boat there.. but the boat could not carry entire world of species.. its all a make believe myth talk about you being gullible.. its pure nonsense.. but maybe you were descended by incest .. could work

Vor 5 Monate
CYBER TROLL
CYBER TROLL

Firstname Lastname god bless ya mate. I hope you find jesus someday.

Vor 5 Monate
Firstname Lastname
Firstname Lastname

CYBER TROLL, Your written words suggest the mentality of an adolescent child. Not interested in conversing with you any further. And by the way, I'm not your bud, mate. Grow up. You may have the last word...

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

You intellectual, moral and spiritual reprobates and cretins cannot even decide upon that which you lie do profusely about. “God doesn’t even exist cuz He sucks, is mean and thinks He’s God er sumpthin”! “But when we idiots decide He exists, He’s mean, judgmental, He lies n does bad stuff to evil people, so don’t believe a word God says”! You’re all pathetic.

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Boxspot don’t need to explain anything to you Slappy. You’ve got the internet and you found aaaaaalllll of the answers already. Why does my opinion matter? You’re just a bitter, sour ass who knows if God “exists”, your shithead lifestyle needs corrected. So “it caaaan’t be true”!

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Boxspot you don’t get to pretend that science has disproven the supernatural. Show me the method, experiments and repeatable results dipshit. I’ll wait.

Vor 3 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

P - you think genesis presents or represents science. Well, that explains a lot. Ok, could you explain scientifically how there was light before the skygod made the sun and stars? "God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be "the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark them? 1:3-5" http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/long.html How does that work pbrain?

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Boxspot Genesis 1:1 you moron! What books do you read, “We Came From the Rocks Jack”.....? Huh? You’re a dumbass.

Vor 3 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

P - Science was made by the skygod! That is one of your funniest comments yet ! :) Design, well, some of us understand the difference between things that are actually designed and those that are not. How? Because we have so many examples to compare one against the other; that which is designed and manufactured compared to those that naturally occur. Or to put it more simply, the difference between a car and a tree. Your claiming nature itself is designed. And your source reference for comparison to prove that point is what?

Vor 3 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/zjBeR6f-NZ8

Vor 6 Monate
Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin

Not exactly sinking the Ark but as always delivering his own very arrogant views and insults the way he knows best. This guy is a massive cunt!!

Vor 6 Monate
Alan Stone
Alan Stone

Theres so much diversity because of evolution and you find that hard to believe? So you know for a fact that this is impossible through evolution? You need things to be simple in order for it to be believable? Sorry but sometimes things get complex. Do you deny calculus because its more complex than 2+2?

Vor 4 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Vladimir Putin - Evolution already explains why life is diverse; that is why it is a scientific theory. Your inability to understand it is a reflection of a personal problem and not with the theory itself.

Vor 5 Monate
Totally Anonymous
Totally Anonymous

the single problem i have with god...is that there are sooooo many to chose from

Vor 5 Monate
Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin

No mention of 'sky fairies' in the Bible. I can't be bothered to reply to your next comment as it will likely be another negative and arrogant response. Go on, prove me right like I know you want to.

Vor 5 Monate
Totally Anonymous
Totally Anonymous

so you believe in sky fairies....i have lost all respect for you mr putin...i hope russia dont get out of the group stage...

Vor 5 Monate
Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin

I hate this posh cunt!!

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/XjHhtWL_3Og No this is better stuff. No doubt about it.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/HcnfT4arZtI

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Here you go. http://youtu.be/3OTDK3mjTro

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/X1_rKWGoHiQ

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

And he’s your typical communist fascist dictator, disbelieving in individual liberty. This piece of garbage of a human being cannot hit the ash pile of “darwinianism” like all of the imaginary ape-like ancestors before him.

Vor 6 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

the fascist dictator sits in the White House

Vor Monat
Boxspot
Boxspot

Hitchens provides a concise summary about theists, dictatorships and fascists ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx1FM28D85w

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

This devil with a snooty, scoffing British accent is pathetic. Dawkins is a moron listening to voices of denial.

Vor 6 Monate
barrncat1950
barrncat1950

Fuck the Bible. It is nothing but bullshit.

Vor 5 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

P- don't think I missed it so I'll ask yet again, if your belief in creation and a 'god' as the Intelligent Designer has any foundation of proof, please show an argument for that which doesn't work if 'god' is replaced by 'space aliens'. Or, concede the point - there is no proof for the claim - if you can't.

Vor 5 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

P- in answer to, " only the repentant are forgiven not the sly. " You missed the point P. I said according to your faith a murdering, child molesting, rapist who TRULY repents get to go to heaven. You can't deny any sinner whatever their crimes can't truly repent, so such a person would get to go to heaven under your imaginary belief system. And also by your belief system, a person who had led a life helping others and doing the best they could for all, for the terrible crime of not believing in the skygod, or, holding to another religion, they go to hell. That's correct isn't it? That's what your religion sets as the rules is it not? Total nonsense of course and as said before its twaddle, a creation of men for control of others through fear. Nothing more.

Vor 5 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

P - If you'd been born into a Muslim family where 99.6% of the population are Muslims you'd be one of the 0.4% that finds another faith. Sure, that sounds totally believable and rational. But what about the rest P? You're saying every single person of the Muslim faith is evil and deserves to go to hell for being a Muslim? Really? Same for Hindu's, Jews, other rival christian denominations, and all the other religions I guess. All total evil people for being born into the wrong religion huh? How very christian.

Vor 5 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

P - you asked "what book are you talking about? Sounds like pretty harsh rhetoric for any book. You must be listening to fools. Pity." I'm referring to your bible book of myth, nonsense, cruelty and worse. I'm surprised you don't know it that well. You're not familiar with the instruction to beat foolishness out of children with a rod? That disrespectful children should be stoned to death? That women should remain silent in church and save any questions for their men folk until they get home? That ownership of people, slavery, is accepted in the bible? That incest is a recurring necessary theme for re-population? That slaughtering every living person of a particular race or tribe down to the last new born baby (you know like Hitler tried) is literally a holy instruction? That a father sacrificing his child as a test of loyalty should be admired by the faithful? It's all in there P.

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/X1_rKWGoHiQ

Vor 6 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R16cXQBndQ

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/NS3OgXaHoyc

Vor 6 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

This is much better .. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-h_jNiSczw

Vor 6 Monate
mike jones
mike jones

The real Noah's ark has been found my friends. Look it up and study and open your hearts

Vor 6 Monate
Boxspot
Boxspot

OD ;-)

Vor Monat
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

+Boxspot hahaha great response

Vor Monat
Boxspot
Boxspot

One of these finds? http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Noah%27s_Ark_sightings

Vor 6 Monate
Bernard Liu
Bernard Liu

Lat Jgrip How has the good professor's argument faltered ? What is his Achilles' heel ? Thank you.

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

"You have no idea what the earth looked like 6000 years ago or what kind of water there was" Um, yes, yes we do. We have a great deal of geologic information. "any information or evidence that remotely hints at God must be a lie and has zero credibility. " Wrong. Any information or evidence that hints at god MUST be credible, testable, verifiable and falsifiable. That's how Science works. Thus far, not a single shred of "evidence" put forth by theists to explain or prove their various gods has ever held up to even casual scrutiny, let alone Scientific inquiry. But, maybe I missed that headline. Can you provide me with evidence that supports the existence of your god that meets these criteria? I mean you guys demand perfect evidence for Evolution (which is provided) yet when asked for a simple, credible bit of evidence proving your claim of a god, all of a sudden the rules change. So, I await your evidence with great anticipation.

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

Ima Pseudonym Like I said, your perspective is based on assumption and speculation pure and simple. You have no idea what the earth looked like 6000 years ago or what kind of water there was …heck, you don’t even know how it is that we even have water. Someone tried and failed at building an all wood schooner and now the ark is a lie? Just so you know the ark wasn’t a schooner but a barge. And we can see it and handle it today not to mention that it’s exactly where the Bible said it would be in one piece I might add. I know, not a shred of credibility! A global flood is the best explanation for the Grand Canyon as well, unless you want to go with the Colorado trickle explanation. And what’s lake Mead doing up in the middle of nowhere anyway? Everyone agrees that the continents fit together like puzzle pieces. But what broke them apart and started the drift process to begin with. The Bible says that the fountains of the great deep burst open…that would do it. And we know that there’s plenty of water down there. Just because some scientific hypotheses put the earth at a kabillion years old doesn’t make it so, there is plenty of evidence to the contrary. I know, I know no credibility. It’s a “fact” that dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, right? So then why are we finding C14 and soft tissue in dinosaur bones? Both cannot be true. The latter MUST be a lie, yet there it is. So I guess your standard is simple… …any information or evidence that remotely hints at God must be a lie and has zero credibility. Would that be an accurate assessment?

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

"If all of this is pure fiction in your opinion why would you even care?" Because religion cannot keep it's nose in the houses of worship where it belongs. When it sneaks into the courts and laws of nations, that's when things get VERY ugly. "Freedom can be measured by the distance between church and state. Once those two institutions are one, all freedom has been lost." Can you guess which of your Founding Fathers said that? "There’s plenty of information and evidence regarding the great flood" Sure, but not a shred of it has any credibility whatsoever. "but I’m convinced none of that would mean anything to you" Oh it means something, it's a clear indication that anyone who believes it has been brainwashed to the point where logic, reason and rationality are meaningless. And I noticed you didn't actually address my points directly. This tells me that you acknowledge, deep down, that the story is just what it is; a fable.

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

.

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

Ima Pseudonym What I would like to hear from you is why any of this even matters to you. If all of this is pure fiction in your opinion why would you even care? After all, we’re just bags of stardust, aren’t we? There’s plenty of information and evidence regarding the great flood, but I’m convinced none of that would mean anything to you. It’s also clear that you’re not interested in discovering what may be the truth. So if your objective is simply to try and humiliate me by mockery and showing me the “truth” I’m not interested. You brought up some valid points but then you poison your argument with vitriol. Not a huge surprise but I’ve enjoyed some very respectful conversations with atheists as well. However, I get the sense that you’re not interested in that either. Trust me, I’m not hiding anywhere, my days are long and full…I don’t even have time to sit at my computer, everything is done from my phone. So no, I’m certainly not slinking away (or however you put it) So unless I’ve pegged you wrong…I’m out. I like people regardless of who they are or what they believe or not believe. But it has to be respectful.

Vor 6 Monate
Bernard Liu
Bernard Liu

Lar jgrop Where did the good professor go astray ? And, I should like to ask how 2 blue whales plus 2 whale sharks plus 2 can fit into a q

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Mike Jones - If god has no limits, can it make a rock so heavy that it couldn't lift it? And, no, I am not giving you my name.

Vor 5 Monate
mike jones
mike jones

Ignore Profile You and I been speaking for , 2 weeks now? May I know your name?

Vor 5 Monate
mike jones
mike jones

Ignore Profile If you want to limit God to your own understanding, then that's up to you. I'd suggest that would be very foolish.

Vor 5 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Mike Jones - Something coming from nothing doesn't break any law in physics. Besides that point, you are still using special pleading. Either something can come from nothing or it can't, Mike. Hurry, pick one or the other! You can't have it both ways just because it is inconvenient to your talking points now.

Vor 5 Monate
mike jones
mike jones

Bernard Liu It is not my claim that these legends exist from all around the world, they do exist. That's not the debate. the debate is whether these flood legends are physical and tangible evidence of a worldwide flood... I would say it is. Physical tangible evidence that you or I can search for and find and touch. And these legends are just one line of evidence for a global flood...

Vor 5 Monate
Robert Lee Aponte
Robert Lee Aponte

God makes anything possible.You weren't there to say if it was true or false.Looking for signals.Study the bible because evil has come to blind the people from the truth.

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

Recce; Charles was being sarcastic. The #1 response that creatards give when they are confronted with reality and Science is; "were you there?" So, he was turning it around. He's not stupid enough to actually believe the Universe was created 6000 years ago. Doppler shift alone disproves that.

Vor 5 Monate
Reece
Reece

charles Receski and this is why people who are smart call people like you fucking retards, because you clearly are a retard. Grow up, haha. “ThE woRlD wAs maDE 6000 yeArS agO”

Vor 5 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

Way to turn the "were you there?" nonsense back at them!

Vor 5 Monate
charles Receski
charles Receski

Were you there to undeniably prove that the world really was created 6,000 years ago?

Vor 5 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

I think we're pretty safe. After all, more and more people are abandoning the lies and fairy tales that make up religion every day. "no religion" is the fastest growing group on Earth. And that is a VERY good thing!

Vor 6 Monate
Shreedhar Jajoo
Shreedhar Jajoo

For the idiots that believe this shit please give me some valid points as to how noah's ark is actually possible? you can't fit millions of animals on a 300 ft wooden boat, the titanic is 3 times bigger than that and could only fit 2000 people and only had enough food for 2 weeks

Vor 6 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

easy...God is magic. Sarcasm out

Vor Monat
jchuck316
jchuck316

It DIDN'T HAVE MILLIONS OF ANIMALS. It had 2 of each KIND (species). There are tons of variations of tigers but he only had 2. There are thousands of types of snakes but he had yes just 2. When you figure it out to the letter he had to have enough room for 3-4 hundred types of animals. And if the ark was made to the specs in the old testament it would have had enough for that and their food with room to spare. Just saying. And contrary to movies, all of the animals would have been in baby or teen age stages (so they could reproduce). A teenage T-Rex stood about 4-5 feet tall. Think about it. Makes a LOT more sense than to say the millions of animals we have today came from plasma soup or a rock.

Vor 4 Monate
charles Receski
charles Receski

Hello my name is Satan and I’m actually a very nice guy who was slandered by a sociopath dictator calling himself God

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Reece yea you are “embarrassing to we humans. And by the way, stop crying “evolution”, the fairy tale for hedonists, all the time.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Reece I didn’t write the “fairy tales” Slappy. If I did it’d go like this. “Once upon a time in a boxing ring, Reece challenged Pelesky. After much pre-fight bloviating from Reece Pelesky quickly “Tysoned” Reece in the first round. THE END”

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

Dawkins ignorance is astounding. He actually goes out in public and displays his ignorance, people applaud it and he’s proud of it. 😂😂😂

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

Ignore Profile As I’ve already stated no one created God, he is eternal. He is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. So assuming that you think the universe is eternal and didn’t have a beginning, where did life & consciousness come from?

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

LarJgrip - I think the universe is locked eternally in a cycle of expansion and entropy. So who created god?

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

Ignore Profile So for the third time, you agreed that something or someone must be eternal. What or who do you think that was?

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

LarJgrip - But that doesn't address your contradiction. Your logic demands that god must have been created. If a conscious mind requires a creator, than the conscious mind of a god requires one too! There is no other way around that.

Vor 6 Monate
LarJgrip
LarJgrip

Ignore Profile You said in a past post that we agree on someone or something being eternal. What or who do you think that is?

Vor 6 Monate
Rob Holley
Rob Holley

Dawkins sinks this myth. The fact that 40% of Americans believe this literally reflects their failing education system. The bible is a collection of different writings from a by gone age. It has no more relevance than its literary value. It is not a guide for living or a source of devine truth. Infallible, I think not.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

jchuck316 absolutely right! The same exact God who created the universe, created mankind and wrote Scripture through men, He stepped into time to fulfill His prophesied coming FOR OUR SALVATION primarily but He proved who He was by astounding feats of power over the natural and by His raising Himself from the dead. Need more? Sorry, some only had Moses and the prophets and that was enough for only some of them also. I think it’s humorous that some detractors of Christianity say such things as, “Gee, why can’t God just appear in front of each one of us to prove He’s real”? And , “If God is real, why is there pain and suffering”? God is real, the arrogance and mocking that some people show toward Him does more than sufficiently prove just where all of the pain and suffering comes from and it wasn’t from our Great God. Comes from the hearts of all men starting with the first man.

Vor 4 Monate
jchuck316
jchuck316

Oh please Rob.....if you doubt the validity....look at Bible prophecy compared to today or look at the dead sea scrolls (do you even know what they are).....Ever play telephone...how long can it go before it starts messing up and yet when the Dead Sea Scrolls were found and studying they match to the king james Bible to the smallest detail. How can that happen unless Someone above us was watching over His Word to keep it? I don't know why you have a vendetta against God but He doesn't have one against you.

Vor 4 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Declan Foley it’s “clear”. It’s true. You pick one APPARENT FLAW after another only prove you can have a life without a God and make fun of others at the same time. That’s lame. It happened. Look at the damned planet your smelly feet are standing on. You don’t need a Christian to show you, you need to get on your knees and ask God about Himself.

Vor 6 Monate
Declan Foley
Declan Foley

pelesky100 well Jesus maybe didn't and that story was invented ....I'm not on about that story it might b true but Noah's ark is not . They could not have supported so much on life on that both with so many animals and few people . They would not have been able to build a ship that size from wood as it would have constantly bent and taken on water .I'm not saying EVERY story is be in the Bible but this one clear and is . Just look at the evidence

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Declan Foley “and on the third day He rose from the dead”. How about that story, huh Slappass? You demons just hate the sound of Holy Scripture and it’s messages, don’t you? Suffer in silence then and try to get God out of your head.

Vor 6 Monate
Celebrity Yak Yak
Celebrity Yak Yak

Dawkins isn't concerned 1 iota about the 40% of Americans who believe in Noah's Ark. The Bible says very clearly that the single Antediluvian land mass was divided up after the flood in the days of Peleg into the continents we see today. God sorted out the animals into their diverse natural ecosystems best suited to each one No mystery here at all. No torpedoing of Biblical truth here rather an arrogant and vindictive religious man torpedoing his own faith in evolution while cynics snicker. Oh yes, evolution is a religion and its god is "magick."

Vor 6 Monate
Declan Foley
Declan Foley

Celebrity Yak Yak so.ple do you believe about8 people fed over 14 thousands animals for a year properly on that boat .with the entire land mass under water ....on a wooden boat bigger then any ever built ( Noah and his family were NOT shipbuilders at all )

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Celebrity Yak Yak - The bible made me an atheist. I can't be a good person if I am a Christian. Thank you!

Vor 6 Monate
Celebrity Yak Yak
Celebrity Yak Yak

Ignore Profile Dawkins doesn't believe what i believe that's why he's waging war on the Bible and Christianity. He's already made a fool out of himself in public being unable to refute leading Christian apologists. It is clear that you want to engage in the same endless arguments and display your knowledge of science and cleverness to people. This is just pride. Your real problem is "sin" in your life. You want to do whatever you want without any repercussions. This is wickedness. Well, i'm here to tell you that you will stand in front of God one day and face his judgement. In your lost state you'll be condemned to eternal separation from the God who gave you life. You're just using evolution as an excuse to reject God and be your own little "god." I'm not going to comment further as this is the wrong forum for lengthy dialogue. I will say this in parting, you are trying hard to persuade me of the validity of your arguments which indicates that you're really not convinced yourself that they are true. So there's hope for you because i've tried to debate many evolutionists who refused. They are really lost because their minds are totally closed. Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life. John 14:6 This life isn't important, it's what happens AFTER DEATH that really matters. You're trying to avoid this reality but you can't - no one can! I hope that you find the truth before it's too late. There's NO second chances! God loves you and is calling you to REPENT now BUT he won't wait forever! Cheers!

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Celebrity Yak Yak - So you criticize - instead of welcoming - Dawkins for believing in the same thing as you? How ironic. Only Dawkins can defend what he believes, but creationism is completely moronic. So who invented god? And if so, who made the god inventor and etc.? How do you know god spoke? Has anyone ever been able to verify if he can speak? If he does, how? How does god's words fabricate something from nothing? Have we seen this happen?

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Celebrity Yak Yak - Yes, it would be very difficult for oceans to NOT be salty when they interact with rocks. What do you think is at the bottom of the ocean? Leaf litter? No. The Earth's surface is mostly composed of rock and water can dissolve rock into dissolved minerals = sea salt. You don't have to be genius to figure this out. Your claim of a giant freshwater ocean is ridiculous and cannot be proven. How can you even say with a straight face that rain never existed UNTIL the flood??? And many species of fish do not migrate between fresh to salty water and the few that can demand to be kept in freshwater with high mineral content. Hell, most species of freshwater don't even transition very well between differences in pH, KH and GH. I have been keeping exotic species of aquarium fish for over 18 years and your comment stinks of ignorance. Even if every species of fish can magically transition between differing water chemistries, that doesn't negate the fact that the majority of marine life requires high mineral content in order to survive. Marine ostracods make up the backbone of life in the ocean and they couldn't even survive in slightly brackish water. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about and just making crap up to save your precious bible fables. You waste your brain on defending what most children give up on just because of how silly it sounds.

Vor 6 Monate
Crypto Fish
Crypto Fish

I used to be an atheist like Dawkins until I realised that it is arrogant to assume that we know more than He who formed us. Malcolm Muggeridge once said that evolution will turn out to be the greatest joke of the 20th century....atheism is a total belief system just the same as theism. There is no proof either way, only faith. The more we learn about the universe the less we understand

Vor 6 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

+Roq Shard he/she was never an atheist. People don't go from being reasonable back to being ignorant

Vor Monat
charles Receski
charles Receski

Fish Bit, Polasky, Yak Yak and all the other creationists really need to enroll in a proper science class

Vor 5 Monate
Experiment Master
Experiment Master

In one comment you've demonstrated the nearly limitless depths of your ignorance. Literally every single thing you said is wrong.

Vor 6 Monate
Geetar2112
Geetar2112

Fish Bit Many words come from Theo, meaning god (as you said) but ‘theory’ isn’t one of them. Theory (n) 1590s, "conception, mental scheme," from Late Latin theoria (Jerome), from Greek theoria "contemplation, speculation; a looking at, viewing; a sight, show, spectacle, things looked at," from theorein "to consider, speculate, look at," from theoros "spectator," from thea "a view" (see theater) + horan "to see," which is possibly from PIE root *wer- (3) "to perceive."c

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Fish Bit - "Adaption to environment doesn't prove transition of species into other species." Oh, honey, it does. You do understand that the Earth has gone through extreme changes throughout it's long history, right? The Antarctica use to be a subtropical rainforest home to various species of marsupials, dinosaurs and other unimaginable species of life we would never associate with a cold, desolate desert. The same is true for the Arctic; it too was home to large turtles, crocodiles and palms. So things have to adapt to changing environments otherwise they'd go extinct. And these changes can be anywhere from a slight alteration in proteins to severe morphological changes. Just look at the various species of cichlid in the African Great Lakes. Life on Earth has and will continue to evolve. It is a open and shut case. The only people who deny evolution are the ignorant and the hucksters who profit off them. Which one are you?

Vor 6 Monate
jack freeman
jack freeman

If there is a god then he she or it is either a lousy engineer or a rampant sadistic tyrant.

Vor 6 Monate
charles Receski
charles Receski

Ah yes... the argument that evolution influenced the holocaust has been debunked as the racism stemmed from religious dogma

Vor 5 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Ima Pseudonym takes a “psycho” to know a psycho, ya know? Unless you’re truly a Medical Doctor, in which case you’d never ever attempt to diagnose a patient through texting. On the other hand, if you’re not an MD, you’re practicing medicine without a license in which case you should be in jail. Better watch your attitude yourself dude. You’re about as big a dangerous bloviating idiot as one can imagine, lacking reason and logic, and paranoid that others are the real “psychos”!

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Ima Pseudonym why are you ranting if I’m supposed to be the “sick one” Get help, get God and get saved. 😊

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

You have a link, and clearly, you've never read a single one. And LOL, like I'd give an obvious psychopath any real name. Especially one who uses a fake name himself. There is a VERY good reason people use pretend names online. But your psychosis is making you angrier and angrier, and most probably, more violent. This is common among those with low IQ's. When confronted with a clearly superior intellect, you all feel threatened. Especially when that person points out the myriad flaws and shortcomings of your childish and puerile beliefs. What you can't stand is the fact that none of the books of the bible are nothing more than plagiarized fairy tales. I've proven this time and time again. I've also proven that not a single so-called "apostle" ever met christ. I've further proven that there isn't a single shred of credible evidence to support the existence of your god, or any other god dreamed up by humans over our history. And that, is why your violent, backwards tendencies are showing so clearly. Instead of reviewing the irrefutable evidence, and facing facts, you retreat further back into your delusions. This clearly shows that you were mentally conditioned from an early age and that you were incapable of breaking free from it. To be honest, you have my pity. But those I pity more are the people that have to deal with your lunacy on a daily basis. I've sent your posts to a friend who is a PHD in psychology and from what she read, your posts are classic examples of someone with Cluster B personality disorder. More specifically; Histrionic personality disorder. She suggests professional Psychiatric care, and soon. Before you harm someone. Let's hope you follow her advice. I won't be replying to any of your posts anymore, since clearly, the facts that I point out are upsetting you a great deal. It makes sense, since you are incorrect, yet your psychosis will not allow you to admit it. Please, get help and get it soon.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Ima Pseudonym provide proof that you have even one real friend. Name address phone#. Here, study some fallacies and provide me with your favorite, which one you prefer to use rather than accept truth. Then find real shrink for yourself. 👍🏼 http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-logical-fallacy.html

Vor 6 Monate
Wyn Lewis
Wyn Lewis

WHY  are Americans so obsessed with religion ?    Brainwashing is why.     Cumon you Americans it's time to WAKE UP now.    WAKEY WAKEY !

Vor 6 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

Kim Westwood - Definition of a deluded moron. God exists because my parents told me when I was a kid and I have never asked for evidence or seen any.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Definition of a fool- " God doesnt exist because I dont believe He does"

Vor 3 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

pelesky100 - Your silly book has some wisdom it it. Your book also has a great deal of stupid advice. Rules on how to keep your slaves and which people you are allowed to enslave. But, like most christians, you cherry pick out the nice bits and try to ignore a bad bits Then you tell people who don't believe your fictional book that they have no morals and that your god is somehow perfect and all loving etc. Yet, your god was unable to figure out that slavery was morally wrong and that respecting women was a good idea. Again, quoting crap out of your book of fiction means nothing and makes no relevant points. It simply shows that you are unable to think for yourself and engage with the real world.

Vor 5 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

Petterson Ribeiro - Nobody knows. I don't know. You don't know. Your priest doesn't know. No scientist knows, yet, but at least they are working on it.

Vor 5 Monate
Petterson Ribeiro
Petterson Ribeiro

jusfugly Where did the first cell come from?

Vor 6 Monate
Joseph Underwood
Joseph Underwood

A snooty poot. Go touch a kid you limey fruit.

Vor 6 Monate
johnnyplatis
johnnyplatis

Joseph Underwood and that was your witty and profound argument, right?

Vor 6 Monate
Petterson Ribeiro
Petterson Ribeiro

Over 500 scientists proclaim their doubts about Darwin’s theory of evolution, check this out: http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=660 Evolution is yet a belief and NOT science by professor Jonathan Wells, it’s worth noting how “racional” evolutionist atheists responds to this in the comments 🤔 http://youtu.be/xZn7tTdCm6U Also, check out this out: http://youtu.be/t2sMJMXDiH4

Vor 6 Monate
Fusel
Fusel

Petterson Riberiro And how long is it ago that the have changed their mind about the shape of the earth? Very long since we have enough evidence to support it. Same for Evolution. The amount of evidence that point to one conclusion is way to high to discard it with "Well they will change their mind" Common sense is no way of finding the truth. Before you knew that within a vacuum everything falls at the same speed, our common sense told us that a stone would still fall faster than a feather. But in this case, our common sense was wrong. What did the bible say that was proven so long ago? That pi equals 3? That the earth is only 6000 years old? That Ants are lazy? That the mustard seed is the smallest seed? That the earth has 4 Corners? Because these are all wrong. You only think Atheist bash only against Christians becasue you live in a major Christian society. But We actally think that Islam is as much made up as your Religion is

Vor 6 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

Petterson Ribeiro - People with common sense don't take superstition seriously. The flood from the bible never actually happened. It was just a plagiarised copy of a story from the chronicles of Gilgamesh. We don't try to disprove your god as nobody has proved it. You have absolutely no evidence to support the existence of your particular god or any other god. Satan doesn't exist either. It's all part of the same delusion. The rest of your post was just superstitious ravings and not worth much of a comment.

Vor 6 Monate
Petterson Ribeiro
Petterson Ribeiro

Fusel Scientists have changed their minds many times in the past apart from when they proved what the Bible had told us long ago!

Vor 6 Monate
Petterson Ribeiro
Petterson Ribeiro

Fusel yeah you do need lots of “studying” to believe that nonsense. If you use your common sense only you’d never believe in it!

Vor 6 Monate
Petterson Ribeiro
Petterson Ribeiro

jusfugly Good for them if they are happy with their evidence but people with common sense will not take the illustrations and drawings on the fossils as facts, we know where the fossils came from and that they only show variations within species, the flood is told in the bible and in many different cultures across the earth including some that never heard about the bible. There are too many fallacies to evolution! It is funny how atheists will do anything to try and disprove our God, not a new thing though they’ve been doing it for over 2000 years. Same spirit (Satan) takes different forms, there’s no real opposition amongst other religions they all oppose Christianity. Wisdom is given by God we know the beginning to the end nothing will surprise us, as Jesus has revealed it all to His people!

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

http://youtu.be/IKbIcXEGG4Y

Vor 6 Monate
Rein Engel
Rein Engel

A fucking commercial for the Ark Encounter came on while I was watching this.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Rein Engel jackass Ark Hater.

Vor 6 Monate
Realmasterorder
Realmasterorder

All these misuderstandings come from lack or knowledge yes there was a Flood (more than one as evidence suggest) and there was such a thing as an ARK but it was not just a "big" Boat there are older texts that the Story of Noa has come from and they are more accurate especially talking about Greek ancient texts that speak of the story of Deucalion and Pyrrha that survived the flood and created civilazation after it ! according to that the ship they boarded had divine technology inside it and they were placed between Heaven and Earth for as long as the flood lasted ! the Ark structure was a Casing where the genetic material of all the Known species was kept and released after the flood,it was not an actual pair of all the known full grown animals, because we know that this would be highly unlikely and pose huge practical and logical problems,things writen thousands of years ago are not always to be taken literally and many times are copies of older texts and stories that have lost much of their original accuracy.

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Realmasterorder - Even if every civilization wrote about a global flood, it still wouldn't be evidence that one ever occurred. All we need to look at for a straight answer is geology and zoology and there simply isn't anything there that shows evidence for this global flood. Again, even if any of this were true, a global flood would have devastated every biome on Earth. No forests, grasslands, deserts and etc. would exist afterwards. The surface of the Earth would have been one large salt marsh with zero plant life.

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

"Sorry, there is just no way a global flood could have happen unless you want to invoke magic" And that, is exactly what theists do. When presented with irrefutable facts that show their fairy tales for what they are; they invoke "faith". The biggest cop-out in history.

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

Realmasterorder There was never a global flood. For that to happen, the Earth would have needed to magically produce four times the volume of water it currently has. Worse yet, a global flood would have destroyed all oxygen producing life on Earth. Phytoplankton and plants would have all been destroyed, meaning Noah and his floating zoo would have suffocated. Sorry, there is just no way a global flood could have happen unless you want to invoke magic. At that point, the difference between that and something not happening is the same.

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

"You trying to justify some bias trolling " This isn't trolling. This is asking for actual, credible facts and evidence. Sorry that flies in the face of your cult's teachings. "part from that you assume for some reason that there is no proof around about a global flood" I assume nothing of the sort. Every bit of "evidence" shown to me by theists, is either an outright lie, fabricated BS, or misunderstood natural phenomenon. And, having earned a Masters Degree in Physical Anthropology, I can spot nonsense from a mile away. "or is this like the Evolutionists theories that go along in believing things like the universe was created from nothing " Just. Stop. You're making yourself look even more foolish than at first glance. Evolution says NOTHING about the origins of life. Nothing at all. It is the best, and most succinct explanation for the changes biological forms take over time, given their environment. Nothing more. It is one of the best supported Scientific theories in history. Abiogenesis, is the study of how life arose on this planet. And there have been some very exciting results from the experiments surrounding this new Science. And please, if you want to present evidence, the absolute WORST thing you could link, would be a you tube video uploaded by someone who's greatest achievement is being named 'grocery bagger of the month'. Find actual, credible, verifiable and most importantly, peer reviewed evidence, or be prepared to be treated like a retarded 5 year old. Deal?

Vor 6 Monate
Realmasterorder
Realmasterorder

You trying to justify some bias trolling shows a lack of credibility in itself,apart from that you assume for some reason that there is no proof around about a global flood,i do not know if it is that accurate but that itself is a detail if it really happened,have you sought out and looked about evidence ? or is this like the Evolutionists theories that go along in believing things like the universe was created from nothing or from a dot and that rocks and elements billions of years ago turned into as soup and at some point made Humans and all life on Earth and all living things ! that make even less sense than green goblins and fairies. If you do not want to acknwoledge the Bible or any other writen stories about things that happened in many different cosmology history and religions of the world,you can find many evidence and explanations about the flood being a true event,on the internet if you search and are willing to hear them such as this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=882fmumdm9A but i don't think that anything you hear will make a difference,if you have a fixed mindset and theory you like in your head and do not want to change it.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

“Sheer stupidity” is the mind of Dawkins and atheists. http://youtu.be/LJDQPx1v5ZU

Vor 6 Monate
Robert C. Christian
Robert C. Christian

pelesky100 said _"You live to lie to everyone you can about God, His creation"_ I haven't lied about anything I've said about religion and reading the conversation you can clearly see this. Everything I've said has been backed up with evidence and you haven't pointed out one lie... I just have a different opinion than you do. Does it make you feel better to say that I'm lying or something? lol I've checked out your information you've posed, but have you really checked out mine? Remember god is watching you ... :) ... and you were the one quoting a pedophile, which I'm sure you still haven't verified it. Don't be angry that you were caught taking a pedophiles position, when you didn't know he was a pedophile. pelesky100 said _"You’re a very bad person and you know it."_ If it makes you feel better about yourself, to call me a bad person, then I get it. I volunteer for my community and sit on the board of my community and I've also helped homeless kids off the street, and off of drugs. Just because I don't believe in your little sky wizard, doesn't mean I'm a bad person.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Robert C. Christian then you’re a mean person who believes evil things. You live to lie to everyone you can about God, His creation, Christ and the conscience you have which tells you the truth. You’re a very bad person and you know it.

Vor 6 Monate
Robert C. Christian
Robert C. Christian

pelesky100 said _"shitty life tools like Occams Razor."_ Yes.. I'll stick with the shitty life tools like Occams Razor and the scientific method. lol I personally don't think Christians or Catholics are inferior, incompetent or weak minded. I know many good Christians and Catholics. Many who are highly intelligent! I think people who are not willing to look at evidence become deluded and fanatical. There is nothing ever wrong about not knowing something. It becomes wrong when you don't know and refuse to look... :)

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Robert C. Christian verify this Slappy, in the Holy Scripture, the main things are the plain things and the plain things are the main things. The Old Testament is about the Christ and the New Testament s about Jesus. The dum if the two is that JESUS IS THE CHRIST. You and me son are in desperate need of a moral Savior and you know damn well that Jesus provided that. Go ahead and use crap ideologies like Occams Razor to think for you, pick apart the “literary aspects” of a communication from God Himself through the flawed humans He used and carefully preserved in provision for all that you need to see Truth and finally, follow those whispers of Demons telling you “It’s all bunk” and “Doubt is king” and “You can be master of your destiny” and “Christians are inferior, deluded, fanatics, stupid, uneducated, incompetent, weak minded, etc” and you are the one my friend who has picked up someone else’s mail and thinks that they can figure out other people’s relationships. Ha! Fall on your knees and ask God to make it clear. He will. And ooohhh it can be crystal clear, you just might have to get new friends and give up searching for “shitty life tools” like Occams Razor. Too bad.

Vor 6 Monate
Robert C. Christian
Robert C. Christian

There are tons of mis-translations in the bible and some are: - The designation of 666 - The Myth of Lucifer The designation of 666. The very oldest translations of the bible give the number 616. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast If you don't know how to use wikipedia, the key is to go to the references to verify they are correct. I do a lot of verification... I think you should as well. I am sure you are interested in the truth... so why don't you actually start verifying things ... just like you haven't checked out the priest... ?? Why not go verify it? *The Myth of Lucifer* (yes it's a mis-translation) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil_in_Christianity#Isaiah's_Lucifer_(Isaiah_14) Some of the error in it was quite deliberate, including the biblical designation of Lucifer as Satan, along with the concordant story of a fallen angel Lucifer makes his appearance in the fourteenth chapter of the Old Testament book of Isaiah, at the twelfth verse, and nowhere else: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!" The first problem is that Lucifer is a Latin name. So how did it find its way into a Hebrew manuscript, written before there was a Roman language??? To find the answer, I consulted a scholar at the library of the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati. What Hebrew name, I asked, was Satan given in this chapter of Isaiah, which describes the angel who fell to become the ruler of hell? The answer was a surprise In the original Hebrew text, the fourteenth chapter of Isaiah is not about a fallen angel, but about a fallen Babylonian king, who during his lifetime had persecuted the children of Israel. It contains no mention of Satan, either by name or reference. The Hebrew scholar could only speculate that some early Christian scribes, writing in the Latin tongue used by the Church, had decided for themselves that they wanted the story to be about a fallen angel, a creature not even mentioned in the original Hebrew text, and to whom they gave the name "Lucifer" Why Lucifer? In Roman astronomy, Lucifer was the name given to the morning star (the star we now know by another Roman name, Venus). The morning star appears in the heavens just before dawn, heralding the rising sun. The name derives from the Latin term lucem ferre, "bringer, or bearer, of light." In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can best be translated as "Day star, son of the Dawn." The name evokes the golden glitter of a proud king's dress and court (much as his personal splendor earned for King Louis XIV of France the appellation, "The Sun King"). The scholars authorized by the militantly Catholic King James I to translate the Bible into current English did not use the original Hebrew texts, but used versions translated from the Catholic Vulgate Bible produced largely by St. Jerome in the fourth century. Among other mis-translations, Jerome had mistranslated the Hebraic metaphor, "Day star, son of the Dawn," as "Lucifer," and over the centuries a metamorphosis took place. Lucifer the morning star became a disobedient angel, cast out of heaven to rule eternally in hell. Theologians, writers, and poets interwove the myth with the doctrine of the Fall, and in Christian tradition Lucifer is now the same as Satan, the Devil, and - ironically- the Prince of Darkness. So "Lucifer" is nothing more than an ancient Latin name for the morning star, the bringer of light That can be confusing for Christians who identify Christ himself as the morning star, a term used as a central theme in many Christian sermons. Jesus refers to himself as the morning star in Revelation 22:16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." And so there are those who do not read beyond the King James version of the Bible, who say... "Lucifer is Satan: so says the Word of God" While others with knowledge of the Latin and Hebrew texts say: "No, Lucifer is the classical Roman name for the morning star, and now Jesus is the morning star." This discussion can only anger certain fundamentalists. Fortunately, this issue of errors in biblical translations is not one that we have to struggle with ourselves. Generations of biblical scholars of all faiths have been aware of the mis-translations and of the misunderstandings that arise from the use of archaic terms whose meanings have been lost, or have evolved into different usages. To address these problems a conference was held in October 1946, attended by delegates of the Church of England, the Church of Scotland, and the Baptists, Methodists, and Congregationalist churches. At another meeting four months later, delegates from the Presbyterians and Quakers joined the original group, along with representatives of various Bible societies. Still later, observers were sent as representatives of the Roman Catholic Church. The work on a new translation of the Bible, direct from the sources, stretched out over several years. The most distinguished biblical scholars and specialists in the world were invited to contribute, and every delegate was given the opportunity to review and express his own views on every verse, every word, as presented by the translators. The result of this prodigious joint effort was *The New English Bible*, of which the New Testament was published in 1969 and the Old Testament one year later. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_English_Bible We must recognize that while it's possible God may be the inspirational source of all the Old and New Testament scriptures, he is certainly not responsible for the imperfect translations from the language of the earliest surviving texts. To err is human, and men can become overzealous because of the emotional aspects of the subject. To the point, the verse in the King James version (Isaiah 14:12) that begins "How art thou fallen from heaven, 0 Lucifer..." Has now been translated directly from the Hebrew in the New English Bible as: "How you have fallen from heaven, bright morning star..." *There is no mention of Lucifer, no reference to any disobedient angel plunging to hell, nor should there be.* The bottom line is, the bible has been changed and knowing this, we must be very careful what versions we are reading and what we are reading in to it. The bible has been changed sometimes by accident (as Bart Ehrman claims) due to copying them incorrectly (and comparing them to older untouched texts like the dead sea scrolls) by mistranslations, or sometimes deliberately to change the meaning of text. Sometimes stories have been omitted and sometimes stories have been outright changed. *No one can claim that it is the total works of god, or that it hasn't been altered* It's been altered! Examining the dead sea scrolls, there are Prophecies by Ezekiel, Jeremiah and Daniel not found in the Bible are written in the Scrolls. In the Scrolls are found never before seen psalms attributed to King David and Joshua. They also contain previously unknown stories about biblical figures such as Enoch, Abraham, and Noah. The story of Abraham includes an explanation why God asked Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac. Scholars have been aware of many of these mis-translations... and now you are aware of them... but will you actually look in to this deeper? I think we both know the answer to this question. The main point I am trying to make of all this, is if you're a fundamentalist and believe that the bible is the full works of god, you are wrong. The bible has been changed so we must be careful when reading it. Only intellectually honest people go further and try to see exactly where it is wrong and a good start is Bart Ehrman. Instead of being so lazy to actually verify this stuff - why don't you actually start verifying things? But just know... the more you don't bother to verify these things, the more you are being intellectually dishonest with yourself. pelesky100 said _"I couldn’t be more humbled about the “impact” I’ve had on the people in my small world."_ Listen I will say it again, it's not as if I think you're a bad person... I'm sure you've changed the people around you for the better.... what I said what this... When you doubt evolution, or any science where we have so much evidence for... and just like in the example of the priest, you are not willing to actually really look in to it for yourself and verify it, then you are only lying to yourself. If you do this type of stuff, you will make no long lasting positive change in mankind. I am not saying you are not a good person, but you're definitely not on the right track either. If there is a god, he wants you to use your brain and to verify everything you take in. Not just the things you want to believe in or you've been spoon fed. I honestly wish you the best of luck - start verifying things man... or live in your little cocoon.

Vor 6 Monate
Jess Bubb
Jess Bubb

Sometimes it is impossible to understand the sheer STUPIDITY OF THE CHRISTIAN MIND some one named "Army of Jesus"? is asking for PROOF of the "inexistence" of God...how dumb can you get??? any thing "inexistant"will have NO proof....YOU CAN'T FIND PROOF OF SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT EXIST!! and that is why we say GOD DOES NOT EXIST because there IS NO proof that any God exist.....if you believe God does exist then show PROOF the burden of proof is on you.....

Vor 6 Monate
Fusel
Fusel

Kim Westwood I do not understand what that should mean. How is what possible? Are you trolling? They have diffrent digestive systems and thus they use the grass diffrently. That's like saying how is it possible that if you give 3 diffrent carpendters the same wood, how is it possible that one makes a chair, one makes a table and the other makes a shelf?

Vor 3 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

Kim Westwood - Definition of an atheist. I don't believe in the existence of your god or any other gods, due to a total lack of evidence.

Vor 3 Monate
jusfugly
jusfugly

Kim Westwood - No Kim. It's simply that your claim is not backed up by any evidence. You have never seen any evidence. You have never asked for evidence. You blindly go along with the myths you were taught as a child and have never thought to even try to think for yourself.

Vor 3 Monate
Kim Westwood
Kim Westwood

Fusel A deer, cow and horse eat the same thing, grass. But the deer produces pellets, cow flat patties, and a horse clumps. How do you suppose thats possible?

Vor 3 Monate
Fusel
Fusel

Kim Westwood nop. She does not exist because you have not sufficient prove to back up your claim.

Vor 3 Monate
Jess Bubb
Jess Bubb

TODAY... if a person heard the voice of God...or claimed revelation from the spirit word, that person is properly diagnosed and correctly treated for schizophrenia .. if that same person claims to BE a God or SON of God that individual should be securely kept in a mental asylum... B E C A U S E LONG AGO... if a person heard the voice of God...or claimed revelation from the spirit world, that person was made an apostle, their words were called holy and made into a "BIBLE"...if that person claimed divinity for a failed dead missionary...then churches went up and innocent people were improperly convicted and incorrectly killed for being "HEATHEN, PAGAN, NON BELIEVING....WITCHES",wars were fought and slavery was justified... the fear of a non existent hell made fools satisfied to live in real hell while their leaders plundered... false hope became faith and the stupidity of superstition became doctrine,an indoctrination that make dunces believe they are such savants able to judge the truth of Scientific Genius... this is the sad reality of human history... B E C A U S E THE RELIGIONS OF TODAY WERE BUILT ON THE SCHIZOPHRENIA OF LONG AGO!!!

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

"You continue to dance around that FACT that evolution cannot and will never be proven as a scientific fact." Wow, when you go stupid, you go all out huh? Evolution is a Scientific fact. Period. Here, start with this site. It's written for kids, so it's probably a bit over your head but hopefully someone near you can explain, or at least look up, the big, complicated words for you; http://scienceforthekids.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/what-is-evolution/ And, once again, you've completely avoided that pesky task of providing a single, solitary study that proves evolution isn't a fact. That's extremely telling. Not only about you, but about your simple-minded beliefs. Not that I believed for a nanosecond you could, but your continued refusal to provide even a single link shows me that you're ducking the question, because you (and I) already know the answer.

Vor 6 Monate
Brian Smith
Brian Smith

So ad hominem attacks ARE all you have...kinda figured as much. You continue to dance around that FACT that evolution cannot and will never be proven as a scientific fact.

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

You know, you could have saved yourself a lot of typing, and simply said; "No, I have no evidence that Evolution is false, and I don't have the education to understand it in any case". At least that, would have been honest, unlike the load of Bull you just posted. Look kid, I hold a Master's degree in Physical Anthropology. The only people who claim; "but that doesn't stop you from being brainwashed by the lies and myths of evolution. " are complete morons who've NEVER studied, or had to defend their research in front of a panel before. People who have gone through your work with a fine toothed comb looking for ANY mistakes or omitted data. Once you've seen a panel like that, you know full well that, unlike what the unwashed, mouth-breathing hoi-polloi claim, Science is definitely NOT a group of people who back each other up on any point. Either you have facts and evidence to support your hypothesis, or you don't. And if you claim something without evidence, that's not Science, that's religion. We're still waiting for a single shred of evidence that supports the existence of your imaginary sky-pixie, that can be verified, tested and repeated. "and information without an informer (another impossibility)." Ah yes, yet another "creation is impossible without a creator" claim. Absurd, childish and reductive to the Nth degree. But typical of you and your ilk. Tell me, if it's impossible for a creation to exist without a creator, what created your god? And that creator, what created it? And so on and so forth... You claim one thing, but then give a massive pass to your invisible sky-pixie. Very convenient that...

Vor 6 Monate
Brian Smith
Brian Smith

What does an educational background have to do with anything? Simply to fuel your ad hominem attacks? The truth is still truth regardless of the messenger. I'm sure you would claim to be so educated, but that doesn't stop you from being brainwashed by the lies and myths of evolution. You've got to understand that everything has a bias...even 'science' . Evolution was created by people who didn't want to be constrained by the morality of religion. So they created their own religion with no morality and had to devise some way to explain all of creation without a God. So they invented evolution; the idea that nothing exploded and became everything....life from non-life (an impossibility)...ever increasing complexity in a universe headed towards entropy (an impossibility)...and information without an informer (another impossibility). Evolutionary Biology is the only 'science' that gets away with breaking all the rules of science.

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

"The myth of evolution is built upon mountains of lies." Really? Name one. One that has actual, credible, peer reviewed evidence that is. No credible evidence means that your claim is bullshit. But I am willing to review whatever evidence you may have. Take your time Zippy, I'll wait... Oh, and we really should start with your background in Education. University degree? Anything?

Vor 6 Monate
jack freeman
jack freeman

Why kill all the animals but be ok about the fish - you can't drown them?

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

IGER Television - Considering the authors of the bible thought the world was flat, was convinced that illness was spread through bad air, executed innocents over claims of witchcraft and practiced bizarre sacrificial rituals that involved animals and other human beings, I can't say I would put tremendous value in their beliefs. And the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Vikings, and etc. lived very short, miserable lives often suffering from parasites, malnutrition, exposure and other maladies that would be unimaginable to us. So I will take science over bronze age ignorance any day. Thanks!

Vor 6 Monate
Ignore Profile
Ignore Profile

IGER Television - If you want to get technical, reptiles have already given birth to mammals and it happens quite frequently depending how you define what is a reptile. Taxonomy aside, evolution doesn't claim that one animal can suddenly produce another species of preexisting animal. That is only a claim made by ignorant creationists. Additionally, the big bang also doesn't claim the universe came from nothing (meanwhile, you have no problem believing god came from nothing??) and abiogenesis isn't about life coming from soup. Again, if this only how you can criticize these two, it really just exposes your ignorance of the topic.

Vor 6 Monate
IGER Television
IGER Television

jack freeman scientism one more religion and if you think evolution? Errrrrr Primordial soup? Errrrrrrrrrr lava soup theory? Errrrrrr We came from fish? Errrrrrrrrr Or maybe a fungi? Errrrrrrrr and big bang theory? Errrrrr came from nothing? Errrr string theory? Errrrrrrrr Theoretical black holes? Errrrrr antimatter? Errrrrrr if you think the big bang and evolution are fact not theories then you believe in Scientism and it requires more faith than any other religion. Here is a film called scientism exposed. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AeIGrEtPMmE

Vor 6 Monate
Elsa Debroglie
Elsa Debroglie

A genius at work. Love the crowd too. It is literally ALL you can do at the religious. Laugh at their stupid fucking beliefs / delusions / faith.

Vor 6 Monate
IGER Television
IGER Television

Elsa Debroglie Humans did not come from fish, and "space might be the final frontier but is made in a Hollywood Basement." #evolutionhoax #bigbanghoax

Vor 6 Monate
armyof Jesus
armyof Jesus

Has anyone provided proof of God inexistence? Not even close. Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here? Not even close. Have our sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? Not even close. Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought? Close enough. Has rationalism and moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? Not close enough. Has secularism in the terrible 20th century been a force for good? Not even close, to being close. Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy in the sciences? Close enough. Does anything in the sciences or their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? Not even in the ball park. Is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt? Dead on. ― David Berlinski

Vor 6 Monate
Oliver Dahl
Oliver Dahl

+parkjammer "Don't breed" hahaha

Vor Monat
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

Well said Johnny. The illogic of the theist mind is the thing that holds them back. Of course, if they were capable of thinking rationally, and using logic, they wouldn't be theists...

Vor 6 Monate
Ima Pseudonym
Ima Pseudonym

Nicole, I could not have said it better myself. The fact is; religion is a method to help con-artists fleece as much money as possible, from gullible, frightened sheep, for as long as possible. Nothing more. It is the single greatest force holding back human progress. Once it is finally and irrevocably tossed onto the ash-heap of history, humanity can finally make the quantum leap forward it needs to.

Vor 6 Monate
Nicole Gibbs
Nicole Gibbs

There are more than 3000 Gods in existence today. You only believe in one more than me. If you were a reasoned and logical individual you would realise that you believe in your particular God simply because that is the prominent God in the area you were born and raised. If you were born in India, you would likely be Hindu. You won't change your view. We know that. But you should keep your stories of a magical man in the sky to yourself.

Vor 6 Monate
johnnyplatis
johnnyplatis

Prove God's inexistence? I am Jesus Christ, son of God. Prove that I am not. Do you realise how utterly illogical your argument is?

Vor 6 Monate
Crypto Fish
Crypto Fish

What a plonker. Marsupials, koalas, possums, slothes and the like obviously landed in in Australia and South America on floating rafts of trees and vegetation. Their young tucked up safely in their pouches. Penguins, aren’t they Aquatic birds anyway? Think before you speak next time Mr Dawkins.

Vor 6 Monate
jack freeman
jack freeman

:)

Vor 6 Monate
IGER Television
IGER Television

Petra Kann ok you win   The Earth is a ball that spins, and Wobbles at 1040 miles per hour, it also orbits the Sun at 66,600 miles per hour.     The sun is moving in the Milky Way galaxy at 450,000 miles per hour.  The milky way galaxy is shooting off the big bang approximately 1,700 times the speed of sound, at  1,300,000 mph and no one feels a thing.   And the constellations never change, and Polaris is always in the same spot.       Is all held together by a magical force called Gravity, because an Apple fell on Issac Newtons head. Can't forget the other Occultist Copernicus, Darwin, Kepler, Columbus, Pythagoras, etc. And the Actornots. Thank you for putting us on a cartoon ball. These occultist secret societies probably go back to the begining of written history which is about 5000 years old.     We get most of our programming and understanding of space from satanic Hollywood or television. Oh yeah and we evolved from fish lol.    Or maybe the Bible is right and we live under water, under a firmament, with the sun, the moon, and stars all in the dome kind of like the lost city of Atlantis. Heaven is above and Hell is below. Just like every civilizations before us knew. Egyptians, Vikings, Greeks, Romans, Mayans, Incas, Mongolians, Seminoles etc. Read the first 20 sentences of the Bible I dare you, double dare you, triple dare you. The horizon is horinzontal, and sea level is levelled. Lol Love IGER Television. Here is Venus, Vega, Mars, and Neptune. With a P900 camara. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mQs1Hv6MYVw If you can entertain the theory that all other civilizations had besides this super smart smart one that knows how to Regurgatate theories and stream netflix real well. Here is a link for 35 of the most commonly asked flat earth questions. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyg6hfw_240

Vor 6 Monate
Petra Kann
Petra Kann

"Unaffected by Gravity? Provide the equation for the force of gravity - what parameters does the force of gravity depend on? Then describe the process that creates Ozone (O3) in the earths upper atmospheric layers. Then apologise and suspend your account for 48 hours

Vor 6 Monate
IGER Television
IGER Television

Petra Kann Ok how about this. Ozone is made of oxygen, so here is the oceans and the oxygen slowly rises unaffected by gravity, and rises till, phammmmmmm finally when it hits the infinite vacuum of space. Gravity decides to kick in. PHAMMMMMMM Stay ozone stay. LOL         I would think "Gravity" would have more effect when you are closer to earth not let these little oxygen particles rise miles completely unaffected by gravity and when they hit the infinite vacumm of space ok.   "Gravity" Phhhhhhhhaaaaammmmmmmmmm Activate powers now. Lol phammmmmmm stay Ozone stay. Love IGER Television.

Vor 6 Monate
Brian Smith
Brian Smith

So, because he doesn't know how something happened it must be wrong? The height of arrogance and a really poor argument.

Vor 6 Monate
pelesky100
pelesky100

Brian Smith yea your wrong. If you don’t “know something” like Dawkins doesn’t, you can’t SAY THAT YOU DO!!!!!!

Vor 6 Monate
No. 007
No. 007

Robert C. Christian Im done with him. If you read the previous comments, you can see how i told him the evidence that prove multiple sciences, but he just ignores evidence. Its exactly how you described it. Hes also a flat earther and believes the moon landing is a hoax so we shouldnt really expect anything else.

Vor 6 Monate
Robert C. Christian
Robert C. Christian

No. 007: How can certain people get almost everything wrong? lol - The guy believes he's right, but he has zero evidence on his side... he knows next to nothing about most major sciences... it's sorta embarrassing that these types of people exist. I can understand if he was ignorant of some of the evidence, but these types of people hear the evidence and don't accept any evidence... and then believe they actually have evidence on their side. It's utter madness. In 10 years when we build the first space hotel, he will go ... he will probably think its a hoax.... and then throughout his lifetime, he will keep getting information that he is going to have to ignore to keep his little delusions alive. Noahs flood couldn't even happen according to the geological evidence. What these guys don't realize is that when you have world wide events, there is geological evidence in every single location in the earth, like the K2 boundary layer that killed the dinosaurs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous%E2%80%93Paleogene_boundary They discount geology, they ignore genetics, they discount astronomy, mathematics, dating techniques, paleontology, and a host of other sciences. These are some of the most arrogant but yet stupid people on the earth, thinking they know something that people who work in their field their whole lives, don't know. It amazes me that people can be so blind to the evidence. I first thought.. well if I just showed them this piece of evidence, they would at least update their ideas... but these ignorant people ignore evidence at every avenue and it's impossible to reason with someone like that. Oh well, enjoy your convo with him... he is yours :)

Vor 6 Monate
IGER Television
IGER Television

No. 007 ummm there was a longer video i guess i should've given it to u then but they find wood. They map the metal rivets and then Turkeys Names the site Noahs Arc. But since you live in a marvel fake universe you will find any video to discredit the bible. And just regurgate whatever some other Athiest has written before you.

Vor 6 Monate
No. 007
No. 007

IGER Television Fuck me, I didnt realise you were a conspiracy theory guru and a flat earther as well as being a deluded religious nutcase. That makes you literally one of the most stupid people on this planet. I could tell you that geologists proved that 'ark finding' proved it was a natural rock formation but you dont care about evidence anyways. You are a hiderance to mankind. I genuinly hope you dont have kids.

Vor 6 Monate

Nächstes Video

Universel Enfant Adulte Brassier Gilet de Sauvetage Flottant Canoë Kayak Bateau | Baseus (159) | Mathematics for Finance: An Introduction to Financial Engineering